SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Micromem Technologies ***MAG-RAM*** ( MMTI)
An SI Board Since May 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
95 10 0
Emcee:  wily Type:  Unmoderated
*** Contender For Next Generation Memory ***

I believe this company was previously called Avanti Corporation.

Here is a recent article from Scientific American that explains the context of the technology:

sciam.com

______________________________________________________________________




The magnetic RAM teams have divided along scientific lines to pursue three distinct approaches. Of these, the most mature and thoroughly studied is based on a principle discovered only 10 years ago: a phenomenon called giant magnetoresistance (or GMR), in which a magnetic field changes the electrical resistance of a thin metal film by up to 6 percent. Honeywell has exploited this effect in experimental chips that contain more than one million bits, according to James Daughton, president of Nonvolatile Electronics in Eden Prairie, Minn.

Unfortunately, GMR devices consume so much current that their transistors burn out if shrunk to the submicron sizes that market economics demand. But a group led by Saied Tehrani at Motorola's research center in Tempe, Ariz., believes it has found a way around this problem with a device called, for historical reasons, a pseudo-spin valve. The design roughly doubles the strength of the GMR effect, alleviating the need for such high power. Tehrani reported in November that his team has successfully built eight-by-eight-bit arrays on top of standard transistor circuitry, which allowed them to write and read each memory cell independently.

IBM researchers lead the assault on the second front, devices that exploit electron tunneling through a thin insulator, although Motorola is working on such chips as well. The faint tunneling current varies by as much as 30 percent, depending on whether the fields of two neighboring magnets are aligned or opposite. In March a team of IBM engineers led by William J. Gallagher and Stuart S. P. Parkin announced that it had constructed arrays of 14 bits from such tunnel junctions, as they are known. They have demonstrated bits that are as small as 200 nanometers wide and that switch in five nanoseconds or less, Gallagher reports.

Manufacturing masses of tunnel junctions may be tricky, however. The device is exquisitely sensitive to the depth of its thinnest layer, a plane of aluminum just 0.7 nanometer--about four atoms--thick. Any pinholes in that spread can short-out the memory cell. Moreover, both pseudo-spin valves and tunnel junctions develop flaws at temperatures above 300 degrees Celsius. Chip fabrication lines routinely run 100 degrees hotter.

Those uncertainties may leave an opening for a third approach that has less money behind it, but more history. Edwin Hall discovered 120 years ago that a current moving through a thin film is deflected to one side by a magnet. Lienau's "magram" device exploits this effect, as does a similar design of Johnson's called a Hall effect hybrid memory.

Theoretically, both designs should be easier to manufacture than spin valves or tunnel junctions. They tolerate heat well. And Johnson notes that his design requires only half as many etching steps as DRAMs. Moreover, "unlike all other memories, [magram] can be deposited on glass--perhaps even plastic--instead of single-crystal silicon," Sadwick claims as he shows, during a visit by Scientific American, a glass slide covered in gold wires leading to a one-millimeter-square array of Hall effect sensors. That versatility should allow the memory to be cheap even if it cannot shrink to the submicron cell sizes of its competitors, he argues. With single cells already working, Sadwick says, "I see no reason why we can't get eight-bit commercial samples this year."

Johnson, meanwhile, has turned over his design to Honeywell, which has built one-micron test devices on gallium arsenide. "They can write bits in eight nanoseconds," he reports. The next generation, he says, will be smaller, faster and made atop silicon, the industry standard for microchips.

--W. Wayt Gibbs in Salt Lake City
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
95This is good they are looking to open up new uses. Possible near term revenue. APaz-1/25/2001
94I wonder what this news from IBM means for Micromem. dailynews.yahoo.com clip: rushnomore-12/8/2000
93 rushnomore: I've only read a small amount, but from my current understandinJeff Vayda-4/5/2000
92 John, yes, that is the same technology mentioned in the LA Times article (my porushnomore-4/5/2000
91 Would anyone like to comment on the possible effect of the following on MMTI? John Stichnoth-4/4/2000
90 <b>From the Los Angeles Times, Monday, April 3, 2000</b> <i>rushnomore-4/3/2000
89 Maybe I should keep my mouth shut! Down today - from the IBM news of more capabJeff Vayda-3/15/2000
88 Pretty good staying power given the melt down of the Nasdaq. It would seem thatJeff Vayda-3/15/2000
87 Wily let me put it another way You suck M.Square_Dealings-3/13/2000
86 >>Academic types are rarely at the cutting edge of real world manufacturiwily-3/7/2000
85 Price action and volume Suggests someone is interested in buying a lot of thisSquare_Dealings-3/5/2000
84 From recent press release: "We observed 8 bit samples of MAGRAM perform fSquare_Dealings-3/5/2000
83 >>Weird how poeple that aren't even interested in this stock show up wily-3/4/2000
82 Weird how poeple that aren't even interested in this stock show up here toSquare_Dealings-3/3/2000
81 >>Gee wily, you sure do assume a lot after one post from me<< If ywily-3/3/2000
80 Gee wily, you sure do assume a lot after one post from me. If you do not have aJeff Vayda-3/3/2000
79 >>Wily: would you care to offer "Good Luck" again today? :-)<wily-3/3/2000
78 Mike: From my understanding re: <i>If Honeywell wasnt involved</i> Jeff Vayda-3/3/2000
77 Im in Ive been watching this stock and accumulating over the last couple weeksSquare_Dealings-3/3/2000
76 Wily: would you care to offer "Good Luck" again today? :-) A 53% movJeff Vayda-3/3/2000
75 Good luck.wily-3/2/2000
74 wily: No I dont have any patent history. I am a concept guy, I dont dig too deeJeff Vayda-3/2/2000
73 Jeff, Do you happen to know if any patents were issued to Honeywell for their wily-3/2/2000
72 All: Just an observation/comment. Honeywell worked on this technology years agoJeff Vayda-3/2/2000
71 I think that there are two ways to play this . If Honeywell can find a use for Kenneth Olson-2/15/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):