SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
9/11 Shortsellers: Who are they? What happened?
An SI Board Since April 2006
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
78 5 0
Emcee:  PartyTime Type:  Unmoderated
Most SI folks are pretty much up to date on what's happening in the news. But many of us draw somewhat of a blank on the subject title of this thread. Can anyone provide enlightening information on this topic?

Please bookmark this thread so more awareness can come to the issue--thanks!
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
78PartyTime, There is nothing that I can say that would satisfy Don Earl. We are Glenn Petersen-7/2/2007
77<b>Massive pre-attack 'insider trading' offer authorities hottest Sidney Reilly-8/12/2006
76Enron, investment espionage and the White House www.stewwebb.com Active CIA aWharf Rat-6/4/2006
75THE TOP 40 REASONS TO DOUBT THE OFFICIAL STORY OF SEPTEMBER 11th, 2001 ... AnWharf Rat-5/18/2006
74Fine. Let's see your evidence. At present I seem to have produced the onlyLazarus_Long-4/12/2006
73So?Lazarus_Long-4/12/2006
72I did a search on the keyword "short sellers" on an SI 9/11 ConspiracyPartyTime-4/12/2006
71I really don't know what happened. I know the subject was much in the news PartyTime-4/12/2006
70WHy don't you just write a quck summary? Or have you already convicted BushLazarus_Long-4/12/2006
69Laz, go back and read every post on this thread. I haven't made any allegatPartyTime-4/12/2006
68Why don't you shut up and either back your allegations or get out of town? Lazarus_Long-4/11/2006
67Hey, bud, I haven't seen YOU produce anything but unbacked allegationsa eithLazarus_Long-4/11/2006
66Reilly would have to get about 70 IW points to qualifdy as a low grade idiot. FLazarus_Long-4/11/2006
65THat's only part of it. What abour auto stocks? If oil rockets, so does gaLazarus_Long-4/11/2006
64Can't stay on topic, can ya?PartyTime-4/11/2006
63My gosh--I take back what I just wrote. You did offer something substantive. APartyTime-4/11/2006
62Message 22349130PartyTime-4/11/2006
61You're not offering anything to this thread--just polluting the board. Is tPartyTime-4/11/2006
60Seems so....all mouth,,,,,no balls.....jlallen-4/11/2006
59Here's topic, PartyLie. sfgate.com Now until you show you are capable of dLazarus_Long-4/11/2006
58Incapable of it, I believe.Lazarus_Long-4/11/2006
57Right.Lazarus_Long-4/11/2006
56I am not pissed off laz, not at all. One day all the truth will be revealed. UntSidney Reilly-4/11/2006
55Fine. Leave this thread. I'm not. Sorry that you get so pissed off becausLazarus_Long-4/11/2006
54sfgate.com sfgate.com. There are some reputable first sources. They say maybe sLazarus_Long-4/11/2006
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):