![]() |
![]() | ![]() |
| We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level. |
In the simple days, an audit consisted primarily of verifying that the company had all the physical and financial assets that it claimed, and that it reported all liabilities that it owed. In the world of Cyberspace, most of AOL's "value" - it's Assets - is wrapped up in its Membership Count. AOL has a book value of only several hundred million, yet has a Market Capitalization of over 2 Billion - and it has been as high as 6 Billion in the last year. Conventional audits focus on financial statistics, but AOL's perceived value is based on its perceived membership. Does a publicly traded company's auditor (Ernst & Young, in this case) have any responsibility to audit membership numbers? Has any indepenent auditing agency ever verified that AOL's membership numbers are computed reasonably and state reaonably the value of AOL's membership base? | ||||||||||||||
|
| Home | Hot | SubjectMarks | PeopleMarks | Keepers | Settings |
| Terms Of Use | Contact Us | Copyright/IP Policy | Privacy Policy | About Us | FAQ | Advertise on SI |
| © 2025 Knight Sac Media. Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News |