Meta Analysis - Clinton\Starr Discussions | Political Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics
Meta Analysis - Clinton\Starr Discussions

An SI Board Since September 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
4	0	0

Emcee: INFO_DART	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

The purpose of this thread is to identify the dimensions upon which people are making judgements in their Clinton\Starr discussions. For example, Official vs Private behavior. In this thread we want to quickly identify the criteria people are using to make their point and the assumptions they are making. We do not want to discuss if Clinton or Starr is good or bad, nor what should happen to them. This is a meta analysis of the structure of the arguments.

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
4	Cheryl, I ran across an old CSMA post written by you last year, and I hope y	Blackie D	-	10/21/1998
3	Hi INFO_DART; Great idea for a thread, hope it stays relatively quiet. One ob	Bilow	-	10/18/1998
2	A PM I received. It would appear the hope has come true. To: INFO_DART From:	INFO_DART	-	10/17/1998
1	In my opinion, if someone does something, with an employee, in an office that i	CO	-	10/15/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):