SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
The
An SI Board Since March 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
174 5 0
Emcee:  ChrisJP Type:  Unmoderated
Obnoxious title -- no ?

Since musicguy and other SI members have an axe to grind against Daniel "hey I'm only 15 years old" Miller, I thought I would create a thread for them to post their criticisms.

I first ran into Daniel in 1998 on the LTGL thread. At the time LTGL was trading around .07. Accounting for a 60 to 1 reverse split, it is now trading for around .002. Great pick Dan !

His most memorable post back then was his ignorance of the term "price to earnings ratio". Yet people look to him to "pick" stocks for them despite the fact Daniel recommends you do your own Due Diligence. If you have to do your own DD, then why rely on him to pick any stock worth holding for more than 30 minutes ?

The last straw occurred in March 1999 when Daniel did some front running on ORTH, leaving many people who hopeful have learned a lesson, holding the stock at higher prices than ORTH is currently trading. Is Daniel's involvement in the stock market providing him with an education in the world of finance or just some good experience at playing electronic 3 card monte ?

And most importantly, do his parents know what he's up to and that they may be the ones fined or imprisoned for his activities ?

Post your thoughts here.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
174traderspath.com traderspath.com traderspath.comJim Bishop-7/23/2000
173Well Jim, I was just reading this exchange of posts between you and me. I didn&ChrisJP-7/23/2000
172In the "little ironies of life" department: The motivation behind whyChrisJP-7/23/2000
171.ChrisJP-7/23/2000
170Hi Jim, Since SI no longer locates threads that haven't had posts in over 6ChrisJP-7/23/2000
169 Hi MoneyMade, Yes, I suppose I started this thread to focus discussion on DaniChrisJP-3/29/1999
168 Hey didn't aren't you the same guy that started a thread to bash DanielMoneyMade-3/29/1999
167 Liability to the service providers seems to be catching on. SI better take notiScoobah-3/29/1999
166 Si, just SI. <eom> Jim Bishop-3/28/1999
165 " << state regulators are going undercover online and federal authorChrisJP-3/28/1999
164 And that just SI!! Cisco-3/27/1999
163 << state regulators are going undercover online and federal authorities hJim Bishop-3/27/1999
162 I don't recommend stocks. Period. I'm not a licensed investment advisCatLady-3/26/1999
161 Hi Jim, This issue here is the basis for following any of Daniel's picks, ChrisJP-3/26/1999
160 Catlady, nice as you seem to be, your point is lost on me. Maybe stick to mutuJim Bishop-3/26/1999
159 I agree, I follow me and only me. I don't rely on anyone anymore not even Cheeky Kid-3/25/1999
158 I happen to think most penny stock touts are unethical. I have no way of knowCatLady-3/25/1999
157 Catlady, can you explain why this is so different from Stock Newsletter writersCheeky Kid-3/25/1999
156 To: dreamer (6152 ) From: Daniel Miller ( Ignore ) Thursday, Mar CatLady-3/25/1999
155 different strokes.... nice profile. fits your demeanor. post against? you defentaxikid-3/25/1999
154 i was unaware i had any problems... i suppose this is how you solve yours? difftaxikid-3/25/1999
153 yes you are. taxikid-3/25/1999
152 <<<i>To fight Internet investment scams, state regulators are goingCisco-3/23/1999
151 not that i care too much, but fyi: 1. federal law enforcement agencies (includbadon518-3/21/1999
150 I suggest that you make that statement to SI Admin. I urge all here to do the musicguy-3/21/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):