SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
LIST OF COs. THAT MAY HAVE ABUSED ACQUIRED R&D WRITEOFFS
An SI Board Since April 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
41 10 0
Emcee:  Paul Berliner Type:  Unmoderated
After the recent tumble in shares if NETA, it may be prudent to scrutinize any companies you may be holding that have taken an acquired R&D charge in the last few years in connection with pooling-of-interest acquisitions. SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt had warned for over a year that the SEC would not tolerate excessive writeoffs of 'acquired R&D that has no technological feasibility', which is an aggressive bit of accounting that many software companies such as NETA had been using in order to net a partial 'rebate' on the acquisition expenses. NETA had so many pooling-of-interest acquisitions over the last 3 years that it was only a matter of time before the SEC put their books under the microscope.

The following is a self-compiled list of software companies that may have taken an excessive writeoff and thus can be subject to an SEC inquiry and a concurrent swandive in share price:

Other suspect software companies (all over $10 currently):
1. CIBER - CBR
2. Keane - KEA
3. Sterling Software - SSW
4. Seibel Systems - SEBL
5. BMC Software - BMCS
6. Parametric - PMTC
7. Synapsis - SNPS
8. Veritas Software - VRTS
9. Rational Software - RATL
10. The Learning Co. - TLC
11. Legato Systems - LGTO
12. Checkpoint Software - CHKP
13. Electronic Arts - ERTS
14. Verisign - VRSN
15. Autodesk - ADSK
Non-software
1. Tyco International - TYC
2. Snyder Communications - SNC
3. McKesson HBO - MCK

Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
41 I don't see any major problems usually associated with other software compaPaul Berliner-4/11/2000
40 Paul, Re. CMVT - other than the dispute with IRS, what other problems you see. Cynic 2005-4/11/2000
39 CMVT is on the new sister thread, linked in post #36. I believe that they will Paul Berliner-2/10/2000
38 paul. like the balls of this thread. curious though, would you care to share Beltropolis Boy-2/9/2000
37 Thanks, I will check them out! Cynic 2005-1/24/2000
36 Hi Mohan, check out this newer thread of my blow-up picks: Subject 31937 SincePaul Berliner-1/24/2000
35 Paul, great list you have there. I have been tracking your list and you scored Cynic 2005-1/24/2000
34 This would complete the non-software blowup hatrick: TYCO RUMORED TO HAVE ACCOUPaul Berliner-10/13/1999
33 Is this Waste Management (nee USA Waste) fiasco just another unraveling of a roThomas M.-7/14/1999
32 I guess they would revise upward for certain periods and lower for certain periPaul Berliner-7/6/1999
31 <i>If MSFT is forced to revise any earnings lower ...</i> Wouldn&#Thomas M.-7/6/1999
30 If MSFT is forced to revise any earnings lower over this ordeal, the effect on Paul Berliner-7/6/1999
29 News - MCK restatement to be worse than expected: newsalert.comPaul Berliner-5/25/1999
28cnnfn.comPaul Berliner-5/21/1999
27 Thanks for that contribution, Thomas. That article gives a more in-depth look Paul Berliner-5/4/1999
26 [Slightly Off-Topic] "What's Cookin'? The books, of course. It&#Thomas M.-5/3/1999
25 Thank you kind Sir.... may I suggest again that anyone holding these companies Paul Berliner-4/28/1999
24 Paul, Props!!! If you're not familiar with that sports expression, it meaRobert Douglas-4/28/1999
23 **NEWS** MCK's pooling w/HBO & Co. yields accounting shananigans: cbs.Paul Berliner-4/28/1999
22 BRIDGE PRESS: FASB eliminates pooling method of accounting By Luisa Beltran, Paul Berliner-4/21/1999
21 Here it is: FOCUS-U.S. accounting board votes to end "pooling" (combPaul Berliner-4/21/1999
20 Thank you for that link, Robert... I did not know that a decision was to be annPaul Berliner-4/21/1999
19 FASB to decide if pooling to be eliminated: interactive.wsj.com -Robert Robert Douglas-4/21/1999
18 VRTS down $15 today as of 1:30 pm on no news - maybe an unfavorable though not Paul Berliner-4/19/1999
17 It may or may not be connected to the Compaq resignations, but the Co. wroPaul Berliner-4/18/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):