SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks
DEWY-DEWY ELECTRONICS
An SI Board Since May 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
27 1 0 DEWY
Emcee:  GARY P GROBBEL Type:  Unmoderated
I have been waiting 18 months for this contract money to start coming in and boy o boy it looks nice...more to come as well. DEWY has only 1.3m out and is trading up a bit today at 1.25/1.56 but is worth a heckuva lot more....my opinion only. 4th qtr and next year already look very good. Do your own dd. gpg

DEWEY ELECTRONICS CORP (DEWY)
Quarterly Report (SEC form 10-Q)

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis contains certain forward-looking statements that should be read in conjunction with the
Company's report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1998 (including the section captioned "Current Business
Environment"). Reference is made generally to the information contained in the Form 10-K.

Nine months ended March 31, 1999 vs. 1998

Revenues for the nine month period this year were $5,849,781 which is an increase of $4,112,325 compared to last year's
revenues of $1,737,456. This increase is the result of increased electronic product revenues.

Electronic product revenues increased by $4,162,023 (from $1,423,455 last year to $5,585,478 this year) as a result of
greater production under the Company's contract with the U.S. Army for tactical generator sets. This contract accounted for
96% of the electronic segment revenues.

The delivery of tactical generator sets had been scheduled to begin in March 1998. However, because of engineering changes
initiated by the Company and approved by the U.S. Army, deliveries were rescheduled to begin in November 1998. As a
result of this delay in delivery, production efforts were also delayed causing lower revenue recognition last year.

Since fiscal year end, June 30, 1998, the Company has received approximately $8 million in additional orders for tactical
generator sets. This brings the total amount of orders received for the tactical generator sets program to approximately $14
million. The Company anticipates that the U.S. Army will continue to place additional orders; however, the Army is not
obligated to do so and no assurances can be given to the quantity or scheduling of additional generator set orders. Though the
Company's contract with the Army contemplated annual orders in roughly equal amounts, actual order placements have varied
in timing and size.

The remaining 4% of electronic product revenues resulted from various orders, more limited in scope and duration, that were
generally for replacement parts for previously supplied Department of Defense equipment and other projects performed as a
subcontractor. A large part of such other revenues continue to be attributable to the Company's Pitometer Log Division, which
manufactures speed and distance measuring instrumentation for the U.S. Navy.

Last year, the tactical generator set project accounted for 35% of electronic segment revenues and the remaining 65% were
derived from short term projects.

As of March 31, 1999, the aggregate value of the Company's backlog of electronic products not previously recorded as
revenues was approximately $7 million. It is estimated that approximately $2 million of this backlog will be recognized as
revenues during the June 30, 1999 fiscal year.

As of March 31, 1998, the aggregate value of the Company's backlog of electronic products not previously recorded as
revenues was approximately $4 million.

In the leisure and recreation segment, revenues decreased by $49,698 compared to last year's revenues (from $314,001 to
$264,303). The major portion of revenues from this segment of business have been traditionally recorded during the second
quarter. This year, the sale of a snowmaking machine during this third quarter resulted in machine sales being comparable to last
year. The sale of replacement parts in this segment has been lower then recent years. The Company does not anticipate any
significant revenues from this segment for the balance of the current fiscal year.

Operations resulted in an operating profit of $.55 per share compared to an operating loss of $.18 per share last year. Net
earnings per share were $.26 per share compared to a net loss of $.18 per share last year.

Three Months Ended March 31, 1999 vs. 1998

Revenues for the third quarter this year were $2,025,158 compared to $407,040 last year resulting in an increase of
$1,618,118 in revenues. This increase is the result of increased electronic product revenues.

The increase in electronic product revenues is the result of continued efforts made towards the tactical generator project with
the U.S. Army as discussed above.

During last year's third quarter, the Company had been awaiting final acceptance by the U.S. Army of it's first article test units.
The contract schedule had included production efforts being made during that third quarter, which did not begin until the first
quarter of this fiscal year.

In the leisure and recreation segment, revenues during the third quarter decreased by $23,962 (from $62,907 to $38,945).
This decrease is the result of lower replacement parts sales discussed above, compared to last year.

Operating profit for the third quarter this year was $.31 per share and net income resulted in a profit of $.16 per share. Last
year the Company's operations resulted in a loss of $.13 per share and net income showed a loss of $.10 per share.

Liquidity and Capital Resources at March 31, 1999

The Company's working capital ratio as of March 31, 1999 was 2.16 to 1 compared to 2.00 to 1 at June 30, 1998.

The Company continues to meet its short term liquidity needs through a combination of progress payments on government
contracts (based on costs incurred) and billings at the time of delivery of products.

Management believes that the Company's anticipated cash flow from operations, combined with its line of credit with Sovereign
Bank, will be sufficient to support working capital requirements and capital expenditures at their current or expected levels.
Capital expenditures in the nine month period were $45,878 as compared with $15,370 in the comparable period last year.
The Company does not anticipate any significant capital expenditures for the remainder of this fiscal year.

Year 2000 Issue

The Year 2000 ("Y2K") problem arises from the inability of uncorrected computer programs using only two digits to identify a
year in the date field to distinguish between years beginning with 19 and 20. The Company has been preparing for the impact of
the Y2K problem on its business by testing its own computer systems and by analyzing the possible impact of computer system
failures of its significant vendors.

As a prime contractor for the U.S. Government, the Company is required to maintain precise records for job costing as well as
provide timely and accurate information. It is subject to periodic audits by government agencies of its systems and controls. The
Company has never had any difficulty in meeting government requirements. However, Y2K problems could be detrimental to
the Company or any other company in this type of business.

The Company has reviewed its internal computer systems for Y2K compliance by identifying and testing all of its internal
systems. All critical programs and systems have been analyzed and tested. The operational tests were successful and included
the actual processing applications under Y2K conditions.

In November 1996, the Company hired an outside service to upgrade hardware and make modifications to its main software.
The cost of these services was $5,085. Further expenditures of this sort are not anticipated.

Based on information obtained to date in the course of surveys of key suppliers, the Company does not foresee any significant
impact arising from third party computer system failures. However, the Company is not able to identify all Y2K issues that may
exist at supplier levels and has not received sufficient information from all major third parties to confirm their Year 2000
preparedness. The Company's key vendor is a foreign manufacturer that provides engines for the U.S. Army tactical generator
set project and is the Company's sole source of supply of this particular component. Such information as has been received to
date through the supplier's U.S. distributor does not indicate that there will be a Y2K problem which could result in delay of the
Company's performance.

In this instance and in the case of other important suppliers, the Company has been investigating other sources as well as the
use of other products and intends to continue contingency planning to eliminate any material financial impact on the Company.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
27 Nice move here altho totals shares traded are light...stock up 1.25 to 2.50...oGARY P GROBBEL-6/15/1999
26 Well, at least the spread is a little more reasonable. caly-5/18/1999
25 After some profit taking this am we are now at 1.87/2.12...vol 16,000....pls reGARY P GROBBEL-5/18/1999
24 Just got off the phone with someone there...nice guy. Here's the URL forcaly-5/17/1999
23 Here are 3rd qtr numbers just out on wires...rev numbers follow from 10-q...pleGARY P GROBBEL-5/17/1999
22 C...if it is printed here it's like taking out a billboard at Times Square.GARY P GROBBEL-5/17/1999
21 Gary, Excellent post. Thanks! Do you have any problem with me linking to thicaly-5/17/1999
20 Paul..I agree. Sell the snowmaking biz, concentrate on the defense bids (our naGARY P GROBBEL-5/16/1999
19 GemSeeker...thank you. Remember I am biased as I own it...your view is probablyGARY P GROBBEL-5/16/1999
18 Gary, thanks for the thoughtful and highly informative response. You are a qualGemSeeker-5/16/1999
17 Having followed DEWY for years, I wish management would dump the snowmaking macPaul Andrews-5/16/1999
16 GemSeeker...here is how I see it and obviously this is my opinion only. The 10-GARY P GROBBEL-5/16/1999
15 After an admittedly very cursory exam ,it sure looks like they got a lotta eggsGemSeeker-5/15/1999
14 Eric..proportionately it is very very big and should continue for some time....GARY P GROBBEL-5/14/1999
13 Gary - not only are they bigger, the gov't also is a great payer. DEWY shoEric Fader-5/14/1999
12 Eric..fortunately the gov't is bigger than any single customer and this conGARY P GROBBEL-5/14/1999
11 My guess (review the company's filings to arrive at your own conclusion) isGARY P GROBBEL-5/14/1999
10 That spread is incredible. Anyone know how many MMs are playing? caly-5/14/1999
9 Am I the only one here who is reminded very much of HTEK (circa a year or two aEric Fader-5/14/1999
8 Gary... we have something in common ;-).. great find here.. from their 10QIsrael-5/14/1999
7 Israel...finding interesting companies is a hobby of mine.....thx...gpg GARY P GROBBEL-5/14/1999
6 Many thanks for the heads up here...it didn't take long to put 2+2 togetherMax Fletcher-5/14/1999
5 C-I bot more today as well. Obscurity has its benefits..you can still buy this GARY P GROBBEL-5/14/1999
4 Nice numbers.. nice stock.. good find ;-) Israel-5/14/1999
3 <i>and now you and I know about it.<g></i> Slight correctioncaly-5/14/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):