SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
AOL, now I get it
An SI Board Since August 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
496 2 0 AOL
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Sometimes I take a lot of flack for becoming an AMERICA ON-LINE believer. After all, their p/e is stratospheric, and they only recently turned in their first profitable quarter.

But there are reasons why they are a worthwhile stock. The future of on-line communication is going to be big, no doubt about it. And nearly all of the growth is in the form of NEW customers. Most people like to start with something simple, easy to understand. Of course there is MSNetwork, it will be easy to understand and access. But it will take time to get their content going. AOL is already well established, it is the most popular service by far.

Word is that MSNetwork is not a great service yet, plus they plan on limiting capacity. Also, their pricing plan is NOT competitive with AOL considering what you get for your money.

But the best reason why AMER (AOL) is a great stock is this... It is the only pure on-line play out there. You can't buy stock in MSNetwork, it is tied to MSFT. You can't buy Prodigy, it is owned by Sears and IBM... CompuServe by H&R Block...
America On-Line is the only "pure" online stock available, it is the industry success story. If you want to invest in On-Line services AOL is the most rational choice.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
496 Hi Zippie : every one moved over to exchange2000.com thisd thead about dead..cvJames F. Hopkins-4/9/1997
495 HI EVERYBODY, I am new on this I think everyone is going to like the internt I zippeeee-4/9/1997
494 Well a lot of people thin both ways, I see her dumping..but Steve has been the James F. Hopkins-3/6/1997
493 People obviously believe that advertising revenues are going to catch up with syard_man-3/4/1997
492 Barry So why is this stock up another 10% to 44, yes 44. At this pace will hitRobert Hecht-3/4/1997
491 50 would be truly incredible! Did you read the article in the WSJ last week abyard_man-3/4/1997
490 Barry Can you believe this one is over 43 now, this is incredible. RobRobert Hecht-3/4/1997
489 Yeah, I just bought 4 Mar 35 puts for the heck of it. This stock, while not woyard_man-3/4/1997
488 Barry This one is going up like a rocket the last two days, today on heavy volRobert Hecht-3/4/1997
487 I'm getting ready to join you, James. This dog's going to lose some foyard_man-3/4/1997
486 HI Barry: She's fixing to fall ! Got the url ...it if it's same as beloJames F. Hopkins-2/18/1997
485 CTN stock hasn't performed so well as of late. <g>yard_man-2/18/1997
484 TO ALL: WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AOL AND CTN ??? CTN jugglesWarren Gates-2/18/1997
483 Some are getting out while the gettin's good: biz.yahoo.comyard_man-2/18/1997
482 Hi Barry: Thanx for asking, yes the wife is doing much better, 4 days in the hoJames F. Hopkins-2/14/1997
481 Jim Jan 98 a long way out. If you can afford that premium I think you've gyard_man-2/14/1997
480 HI Barry: Got it, then some..the spin on the extra modems , is cute, turns out James F. Hopkins-2/14/1997
479 Check out the "Fool" fool.yahoo.comyard_man-2/13/1997
478 Hi Barry: I had a feeling she was going to jump up today, but the short sellersJames F. Hopkins-2/12/1997
477 Several big blocks in hundred thousands on the buying side? Anybody know what&Ron Nguyen-2/12/1997
476 <<Why the jump today James? Any word?>> No lawsuits filed??? BriaBrian K Crawford-2/12/1997
475 Why the jump today James? Any word?yard_man-2/12/1997
474 HI Rog: When it comes to the Puts I posted here is my take on them, it's a James F. Hopkins-2/9/1997
473 Hi Jim, >.AOLDJ C APR 97 50.000 13/16 -3/4 13/16 13/16 2,000 >.AOLNG P Froger dixon-2/9/1997
472 Hi Duncan: just a look at were the money was bet friday: taken from PBS 02-07-James F. Hopkins-2/9/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):