SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Cruel Posts
An SI Board Since October 2001
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
287 20 0
Emcee:  Dr. Id Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
This "thread of threads" is designed to cull and showcase outstandingly cruel and cutting work produced by the Silicon Investor community. If you come across a truly exceptionally offensive and cruel post--on any topic, from any perspective--please put up a link to it here. Use your own judgment about what to commend, but keep in mind that the thread will be most valuable if the barriers to entry are set really, really high.

The thread rules are simple but strict. Initial violations will be met with a warning, later ones with a posting ban. The rules are as follows:

1. You can only post links to other people's posts, not your own.

2. You can only post links to original work, not press releases, outside articles, and so forth.

3. All posts must follow the following format: a simple descriptive header in the first line, a brief description of why you think the post is worth highlighting (optional), and a link to the post in question. NO OTHER KINDS OF POSTS ARE ALLOWED.

4. Although anything from anywhere in SI past and present is eligible for this thread, it appears the quicker something gets cross-posted here the more likely it is to make it into the official Cruel Posts. Beyond a day (or two at most) we're probably just speaking to ourselves.

5. None of these rules apply to the thread moderator.

6. Anyone posting responses to the pathetic William will be banned.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
287Hi, Dr. Id. This is OT, but it seemed better to be OT here than on FADG where yoE-7/16/2004
286Hueyone tears Uncle Frank a new one: Message 20223585Dr. Id-6/16/2004
285<i>But that leaves something out. Let's make it "Stupid and InhumDr. Id-4/8/2004
284But that leaves something out. Let's make it "Stupid and Inhumane."E-4/8/2004
283That's correct. Reading it again, maybe we should just relegate it to "Dr. Id-4/8/2004
282Hi, Dr. Id. I think the link from 1997 that you posted to me wasn't the one E-4/8/2004
281<i>http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=2000250</i> YoDr. Id-4/8/2004
280To appreciate how cruel this post is, you have to look at the post to which its E-4/8/2004
279Ah, ya... you got it. -g-Bill-4/5/2004
278<i>Hot, Baby, very hot! </i> well i have some concerns about ann, sMulhollandDrive-4/5/2004
277Oh please. Get a life. Or have the restraint to scratch the furniture in PMs tPoet-4/5/2004
276or exhibits that, hmmmmm... certain je ne sais quoi sinister characteristic of MulhollandDrive-4/5/2004
275Wonder if his "home" knows he's using a computer.DMaA-3/12/2004
274She is the only one I know whose smiley faces have fangs. I don't know how sDMaA-3/12/2004
273I totally disagree with that cruel post. I think your impersonation of Ann CoultBill-3/12/2004
272this post is more cruel than a punitive pair of shoes... :) Message 19907514MulhollandDrive-3/12/2004
271How to tell someone off unequivocally: Message 19472516 ufUncle Frank-11/6/2003
270<i>Wrongly understood. It was intended to remind how any of us can do weDr. Id-10/30/2003
269Wrongly understood. It was intended to remind how any of us can do well. I postApollo-10/30/2003
268Totally cruel. I just hope Bill never reads it. urUncle Frank-10/29/2003
267Apollo rubs it in: Message 19434714Dr. Id-10/29/2003
266cruel, yes... but that smiley grinny thingy does take some of the sting out of inosmo_king-5/27/2003
265That seemed like quite a truthful post to me, Poet. Sometimes the truth IS quitjlallen-1/8/2003
264You missed this one. Message 18416351Bill-1/8/2003
263Message 18412297 You neglected to post what Karen was responding to, which was Poet-1/8/2003
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News