SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Biotech Lock Up Expiration Hell Portfolio: Wave II
An SI Board Since March 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
107 18 0
Emcee:  tuck Type:  Unmoderated
This thread, a companion to BLUE HP

Subject 51229

is for discussion of the new wave of biotech IPOs, that have come out in late 2003 and on into 2004. This thread was formed to make comparison with the old wave -- the 2000 and 2001 era -- a little easier. Those stories are still playing out. As folks go through the S-1s, please comment on the capital structure. In the previous wave, VC had gotten large chunks at such low prices that they could cash out at almost any price and still make money. They floated all manner of companies before their business models had proven out because of that ability.

Are we seeing the same story here in a slightly different form? Certainly we're not seeing genomics and platform technolgy companies anymore. No, the emphasis now is on late stage products. But has the VC overhang changed any?

In any case, I'm migrating the new wave portion of BLUE HP's portfolio over here, including the one transaction involving a new wave company, a short of Eyetech. For we have discovered that IPOs are shortable by the masses a few days after the debut, perhaps courtesy of flippers.

As before, polite on topic discussion is expected.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
107Fluidigm (FLDM), a microfluidics company I used to follow as competition to Calituck-9/12/2011
106Sunesis stumbles out the Wave III window: >>[Archiving from Briefing] 09tuck-9/27/2005
105A small insider buy at Acusphere, which has just hit new all time lows. Not bigtuck-5/15/2005
104>>GERMANTOWN, Md., May 9 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Advancis Pharmaceuticaltuck-5/10/2005
103>>BOULDER, Colo., April 26 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Pharmion Corporation tuck-4/26/2005
102WATERTOWN, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--April 13, 2005--Acusphere, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACUStuck-4/13/2005
101>>CARLSBAD, CA--(MARKET WIRE)--Apr 6, 2005 -- CancerVax Corporation (Nasdatuck-4/6/2005
100If they'd just agree a merger with GlycoFi, then I could really fill my bootnigel bates-3/21/2005
99I recognize less than 10% of those symbols. Would be curious how many the averagMike McFarland-3/21/2005
98I saw mnta at Cowen last week. Lack of near term drivers will keep people away, rkrw-3/21/2005
97Thanks !nigel bates-3/20/2005
96Insider activity update (not taking into account stealth dribblers holding less tuck-3/20/2005
95Santarus to Receive $10 Million Milestone Payment from Tap Pharmaceutical Producnigel bates-2/15/2005
94>>NEW YORK, Jan. 20 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inctuck-1/20/2005
93After a bit of buying in the summer and fall, considerable selling now that ALNYtuck-1/12/2005
92Signals updates the IPO filings: signalsmag.com Cheers, Tucktuck-1/10/2005
91Thanks ! (eom)nigel bates-1/7/2005
90Insider activity update . . . Selling at Memory, Immunicon, Eytech, Pharmion.tuck-1/6/2005
89>>TOKYO, and SAN DIEGO, Jan. 5 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Sankyo Co., Ltd. tuck-1/5/2005
88>>WATERTOWN, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Dec. 16, 2004--Acusphere, Inc. (NASDAtuck-12/16/2004
87>>GERMANTOWN, Md., Dec. 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Advancis Pharmaceutictuck-12/14/2004
86SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., Dec. 7 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Theravance, Inc. (tuck-12/7/2004
85You gather correctly. News? Don't know. But it's another one where I scaram(o)uche-11/5/2004
84Indeed, we do not seem to be getting the knee jerk sell off one usually sees afttuck-11/5/2004
83Yup, but a nice rescue. Hope that other companies, and one in particular, can mscaram(o)uche-11/5/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):