SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Mountain Pronvince Diamonds
An SI Board Since May 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
10 1 0 MPVI
Emcee:  Chas. Type:  Unmoderated
Old thread gone so I thought I would start another one......alll thoughts welcomed, pro or con, good or bad, for or against.
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10Chuck,if you read the report to shareholders 2003 the Faraday body had intersectjames flannigan-6/19/2004
9james you're dreaming, its a dyke 6'wide and that is probably at the swChas.-6/18/2004
8The New extention of the Faraday body may well mean that the overall project coujames flannigan-6/18/2004
7Chuck,if you go to Debeers webb site,the deposit is almost exact at Snap as KL, james flannigan-5/25/2004
6jim, Turner played Winspear/DeBeers like a fiddle and got exactly what he wantedChas.-5/24/2004
5Chuck,I too think the market has handed us a window to buy cheap shares.As we knjames flannigan-5/24/2004
4james, I couldnt agree more....you are right on, I think it is just time to buy Chas.-5/23/2004
3Another point,MPV management,why dont they take the parcels we have and get a nejames flannigan-5/23/2004
2I belive the sell off is because of the pull back in all mining stocks.Nothing hjames flannigan-5/23/2004
1well the header pretty much says it....also.......... thoughts on DeBeers... tChas.-5/23/2004
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):