SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
PRESIDENT BUSH - UNFIT FOR COMMAND
An SI Board Since August 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
660 11 0
Emcee:  M0NEYMADE Type:  Moderated
HURRAH! BRILLIANT! "Greenspan Floats Higher Retirement Age"
Friday August 27, 11:59 am ET
By Rebecca Byrne, Senior Writer

Updated from 11:23 a.m. EDT
An aging population will put significant stresses on the budget deficit over the next three decades, a problem that could be solved by raising the retirement age, Federal Reserve Chief Alan Greenspan said in a speech Friday.

At a symposium sponsored by the Fed Bank of Kansas in Jackson Hole, Wyo., Greenspan said the economy is not prepared to cope with a doubling in the elderly population by 2035, and said changes to benefit programs must be made before the baby boom generation retires.

"As a nation, we owe it to our retirees to promise only the benefits that can be delivered," he said. "If we have promised more than our economy has the ability to deliver to retirees ... we must recalibrate our public programs so that pending retirees have time to adjust through other channels."

Greenspan's speech didn't address monetary policy or the current state of the economy.

Financing expected future shortfalls in Social Security and Medicare solely through increased payroll taxes is not the answer, Greenspan said, because higher taxes would lower the incentive to work and therefore reduce the pool of workers who pay into the system.

Instead, Greenspan suggested that the government promote policies to extend working life, saying this could "ameliorate some of the potential demographic stresses."

"Changes to the age for receiving full retirement benefits or initiatives to slow the growth of Medicare spending could affect retirement decisions, the size of the labor force and saving behavior," he said.

The growth rate of the working-age population in the U.S. is expected to slow to about 0.25% per year by 2035 from 1.0% today, according to Greenspan. At the same time, the percentage of the population over the age of 65 is anticipated to rise to about 20% in 2035 from just 12% today.

Unless actions are taken, these demographic changes will place a huge burden on the budget deficit. "Most observers expect Social Security, under existing law, to be in chronic deficit over the long haul," Greenspan said.

The shortfalls in the Medicare program will be even larger and much more difficult to eliminate, he continued. "Medicare faces financial pressure not only from the changing composition of the population, but also from continually increased per recipient demand for medical services," he said.

While the changes projected for the U.S. aren't as dramatic as those projected for Europe and Japan, "they nonetheless present substantial challenges," Greenspan said.

Strong productivity gains "offer the greatest potential for boosting U.S. gross domestic product to a level that would enable future retirees to maintain their expected standard of living without unduly burdening future workers," Greenspan said. But a continuation of the exceptional productivity gains seen in recent years would be unprecedented.

The decade-long rise in productivity growth has been due to "the effectiveness with which we have invested both domestic saving and funds attracted from abroad.... But...it is difficult to imagine that we can continue indefinitely to borrow saving from abroad at a rate equivalent to 5% of U.S. gross domestic product."

In an election year, Greenspan's remarks resonate loudly. President Bush has advocated privatizing social security while Sen. John Kerry has said he would like to keep the system as it is. "I will not privatize social security," he said in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention on July 29. "I will not cut benefits."

Greenspan has tried to straddle the debate, saying only that "tough policy choices lie ahead." Still, he has endorsed the president's tax cuts and has said tax increases alone won't help to solve the deficit problem.

If early initiatives aren't taken to address the effects of baby boom retirements, Greenspan said adjustments could be "abrupt and painful."

"Curbing benefits once bestowed has proved so difficult in the past, fiscal policymakers must be especially vigilant to create new benefits only when their sustainability under the most adverse projections is virtually ensured," he said.

The Federal Reserve raised rates earlier this month, saying that the economy is "poised to resume a stronger pace of expansion." Central bankers next meet on Sept. 21.

yahoo.com
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
660So...you lied again? Message 23952628 You are so transparent....it would be amjlallen-10/10/2007
659Republicans candidates endorse Bush incompetence.Kenneth E. Phillipps-10/10/2007
658and the dem candidates couldn't run a 7-11longnshort-10/9/2007
657Republican candidates scare the hell out of me. Everyone of them except Paul woKenneth E. Phillipps-10/9/2007
656I saw a videotape of her claiming credit....so I guess that would be a smoking gjlallen-10/4/2007
655Well it's a non profit tax exempt and those can't be involved with politlongnshort-10/4/2007
654She claimed she did.....jlallen-10/4/2007
653So did Hillary help start Media Matters ?longnshort-10/4/2007
652Could be that too...but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt...jlallen-10/4/2007
651No, sounds like whacko BSD conspiracy craplongnshort-10/4/2007
650I don't know if he is making it up....he may be mistaken... J.jlallen-10/4/2007
649right, and he has no link, typical lib. making crap uplongnshort-10/4/2007
648I thought it was illegal to assassinate other heads of state...jlallen-10/4/2007
647check this whaco out. Message 23936552longnshort-10/3/2007
646You ought to be impeached for this Stalinist post: Message 23935675 Ever hear jlallen-10/3/2007
645Stuck in a hole, Limbaugh keeps digging Posted October 3rd, 2007 at 10:30 am Wbentway-10/3/2007
644he should be impeached just for HAVING this woman in the White Boyz House I hateSkywatcher-10/3/2007
643you are the idiotlongnshort-9/28/2007
642What a silly post, chrissy poo...did you forget your bran this AM...you seem verjlallen-9/28/2007
641too bad THE FRIGGEN PRESIDENT CAN'T SPEAK HIS OWN LANGUAGE YOU MORON YOU arSkywatcher-9/28/2007
640<i>"Childrens do learn"</i> Too bad you are not a child..jlallen-9/28/2007
639"Childrens do learn" Impeach the Idiot!Don Hurst-9/28/2007
638LOL!! So you think Bush should have given SH classifed intel? Why? So he coujlallen-9/28/2007
637>>' <i>I thought you libs said he didn't have and wasn'tDon Hurst-9/28/2007
636Less than a month before the U.S. invasion of Iraq, Saddam Hussein signaled thatlongnshort-9/27/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):