SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
Kofi Annan Must Go!
An SI Board Since December 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
41 2 0
Emcee:  Proud_Infidel Type:  Unmoderated
Can anyone please give me a reason as to why he should NOT go? There is rampant corruption at the UN, the Sudan is in the midst of a genocide, N. Korea and Iran are gathering nukes without any intervention by the UN. Exactly why should this guy remain as chairman when the organization of late has been an utter failure? Can anyone out there make a case for him staying? I would love to hear it.

Kofi Annan Must Go

By NORM COLEMAN
December 1, 2004; Page A10

It's time for U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan to resign.

Over the past seven months, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which I chair, has conducted an exhaustive, bipartisan investigation into the scandal surrounding the U.N. Oil-for-Food program. That noble program was established by the U.N. to ease the suffering of the Iraqi people, then languishing under Saddam Hussein's ironfisted rule, as well as the economic sanctions imposed on Iraq by the U.N. after the first Gulf War. While sanctions were designed to instigate the removal of Saddam from power, or at least render him impotent, the Oil-for-Food program was designed to support the Iraqi people with food and other humanitarian aid under the watchful eye of the U.N.


Our Investigative Subcommittee has gathered overwhelming evidence that Saddam turned this program on its head. Rather than erode his grip on power, the program was manipulated by Saddam to line his own pockets and actually strengthen his position at the expense of the Iraqi people. At our hearing on Nov. 15, we presented evidence that Saddam accumulated more than $21 billion through abuses of the Oil-for-Food program and U.N. sanctions. We continue to amass evidence that he used the overt support of prominent members of the U.N., such as France and Russia, along with numerous foreign officials, companies and possibly even senior U.N. officials, to exploit the program to his advantage. We have obtained evidence that indicates that Saddam doled out lucrative oil allotments to foreign officials, sympathetic journalists and even one senior U.N. official, in order to undermine international support for sanctions. In addition, we are gathering evidence that Saddam gave hundreds of thousands -- maybe even millions -- of Oil-for-Food dollars to terrorists and terrorist organizations. All of this occurred under the supposedly vigilant eye of the U.N.

* * *
While many questions concerning Oil-for-Food remain unanswered, one conclusion has become abundantly clear: Kofi Annan should resign. The decision to call for his resignation does not come easily, but I have arrived at this conclusion because the most extensive fraud in the history of the U.N. occurred on his watch. In addition, and perhaps more importantly, as long as Mr. Annan remains in charge, the world will never be able to learn the full extent of the bribes, kickbacks and under-the-table payments that took place under the U.N.'s collective nose.

Mr. Annan was at the helm of the U.N. for all but a few days of the Oil-for-Food program, and he must, therefore, be held accountable for the U.N.'s utter failure to detect or stop Saddam's abuses. The consequences of the U.N.'s ineptitude cannot be overstated: Saddam was empowered to withstand the sanctions regime, remain in power, and even rebuild his military. Needless to say, he made the Iraqi people suffer even more by importing substandard food and medicine under the Oil-for-Food program and pawning it off as first-rate humanitarian aid.

Since it was never likely that the U.N. Security Council, some of whose permanent members were awash in Saddam's favors, would ever call for Saddam's removal, the U.S. and its coalition partners were forced to put troops in harm's way to oust him by force. Today, money swindled from Oil-for-Food may be funding the insurgency against coalition troops in Iraq and other terrorist activities against U.S. interests. Simply put, the troops would probably not have been placed in such danger if the U.N. had done its job in administering sanctions and Oil-for-Food.

This systemic failure of the U.N. and Oil-for-Food is exacerbated by evidence that at least one senior U.N. official -- Benon Sevan, Mr. Annan's hand-picked director of the U.N.'s Oil-for-Food oversight agency -- reportedly received bribes from Saddam. According to documents from the Iraqi oil ministry that were obtained by us, Mr. Sevan received several allotments of oil under Oil-for-Food, each of which was worth hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of dollars.

To make matters worse, the actions of Mr. Annan's own son have been called into question. Specifically, the U.N. recently admitted that Kojo Annan received more money than previously disclosed from a Swiss company named Cotecna, which was hired by the U.N. to monitor Iraq's imports under Oil-for-Food. Recently, there are growing, albeit unproven, allegations that Kofi Annan himself not only understands his son's role in this scandal -- but that he has been less than forthcoming in what he knew, and when he knew it.

As a former prosecutor, I believe in the presumption of innocence. Such revelations, however, cast a dark cloud over Mr. Annan's ability to address the U.N.'s quagmire. Mr. Annan has named the esteemed Paul Volcker to investigate Oil-for-Food-related allegations, but the latter's team is severely hamstrung in its efforts. His panel has no authority to compel the production of documents or testimony from anyone outside the U.N. Nor does it possess the power to punish those who fabricate information, alter evidence or omit material facts. It must rely entirely on the goodwill of the very people and entities it is investigating. We must also recognize that Mr. Volcker's effort is wholly funded by the U.N., at Mr. Annan's control. Moreover, Mr. Volcker must issue his final report directly to the secretary general, who will then decide what, if anything, is released to the public.

Therefore, while I have faith in Mr. Volcker's integrity and abilities, it is clear the U.N. simply cannot root out its own corruption while Mr. Annan is in charge: To get to the bottom of the murk, it's clear that there needs to be a change at the top. In addition, a scandal of this magnitude requires a truly independent examination to ensure complete transparency, and to restore the credibility of the U.N. To that end, I reiterate our request for access to internal U.N. documents, and for access to U.N. personnel who were involved in the Oil-for-Food program.

All of this adds up to one conclusion: It's time for Kofi Annan to step down. The massive scope of this debacle demands nothing less. If this widespread corruption had occurred in any legitimate organization around the world, its CEO would have been ousted long ago, in disgrace. Why is the U.N. different?

Sen. Coleman is chairman of the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, and a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
41I certainly don't think they speak for a majority of Americans..... U.S. deProud_Infidel-12/10/2004
40Message 20823110DuckTapeSunroof-12/3/2004
39An Open Letter to Reverend Ray Hammond We've Talked Too Much About Slavery bgoldworldnet-12/2/2004
38Thank you for the link.....I will have to watch it when I have more time. RegarProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
37This is a good link for Sudan information. americanprogressaction.org * * *goldworldnet-12/2/2004
36<i> I mainly want us to go after France and rub their noses in it. </i&Proud_Infidel-12/2/2004
35It’s a hard proposition to clean up the UN, but maybe we can make some improvemegoldworldnet-12/2/2004
34LOL....can you see ANYTHING which would even come close to making him an "iProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
33At present it is unamerican, and I also think it is necessary to have. I am notProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
32Never met the man.DuckTapeSunroof-12/2/2004
31At its core the UN is anti-American. Unfortunately replacing the secretary-genergoldworldnet-12/2/2004
30Can you explain what makes him an "inspiration"?Proud_Infidel-12/2/2004
29Like I said: he's popular with many of the member nations....DuckTapeSunroof-12/2/2004
28Correct --- the member nations must do it themselves.DuckTapeSunroof-12/2/2004
27UN chief's Rwanda genocide regret Annan headed UN peacekeepers at the timeProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
26What is it with Spain?!?! Annan is an "inspiration to us all"? YeaProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
25“No one would ask Ken Lay to reform Enron. You can’t ask Kofi Annan to reform thProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
24"Well, then logically Saddam was IN power illegally as he grabbed power thrDuckTapeSunroof-12/2/2004
23Well, then logically Saddam was IN power illegally as he grabbed power through mProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
22I think the calls for his replacement have more to do with the fact he had the gDuckTapeSunroof-12/2/2004
21No surprise --- oil is the foundation for Iraq's national economy. PracticalDuckTapeSunroof-12/2/2004
20Nothing really surprising about fraud in such things --- with the big bucks invoDuckTapeSunroof-12/2/2004
19They proceeded to the Duquesne Club, where Mr. Johnson presented the Secretary-GProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
18freepers.zill.netProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
17usasurvival.orgProud_Infidel-12/2/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):