SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics
One nation under God
An SI Board Since December 2004
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
60 2 0
Emcee:  Gersh Avery Type:  Moderated
We need to form a simple note and add it to the US constitution.

We need the language to be acceptable to the majority of Americans. But the message needs to say "Keep your courts out of Gods face."

We do not need the actions of congress to get this started!

current proposed wording:

No court shall have jurisdiction over any matter that pertains to God.

Please .. any other suggestions for wording?
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
60This is an absolute outrage. The Bible is the basis for our system of laws. EvGersh Avery-3/29/2005
59not that it matters to the question, but no.nolimitz-12/11/2004
58are you Muslim?Gersh Avery-12/10/2004
57How about Muslims? It will be interesting to see your banned list in a week or nolimitz-12/10/2004
56The truth is in your heart .. If your heart says that the word "God" Gersh Avery-12/8/2004
55But are we inclusive or what? In my simple understanding of Gaia: Gaia is the Peter Dierks-12/8/2004
54Hummm .. I don't recall that name before (Gaiaists) I don't believe thaGersh Avery-12/8/2004
53God is a term generally associated with Christianity. I am not familiar with anyPeter Dierks-12/8/2004
52Thank you Peter for an on topic post. I had proposed "No court shall have Gersh Avery-12/8/2004
51This is a nation that was formed by God fearing people However, not all were strPeter Dierks-12/8/2004
50God could change his/her mind about free will whenever it was convienient. TPTigerPaw-12/8/2004
49I put this thread up to form the new amendment. Not to debate about if there shoGersh Avery-12/8/2004
48Teachers are not allowed to preach to students in public schools. It is up to tredfish-12/8/2004
47The school district is vigorously trying to CYA .. Fortunately there is evidencGersh Avery-12/8/2004
46I would have more respect for you so-called "Christians" if you had moredfish-12/8/2004
45While the district has continued teaching, this teacher has been bared from usinGersh Avery-12/8/2004
44Cupertino history lesson Wednesday, December 8, 2004 WHEN IN the course of humredfish-12/8/2004
43<i>Mr. Haynes, who helped draft national guidelines on religion and schoolGersh Avery-12/8/2004
42Does the truth mean nothing to you? <i>Cupertino's spokesman, Jeffreyredfish-12/8/2004
41"This is a History class." True statement? According to the articlesGersh Avery-12/8/2004
40"Are you aware of the CA case where a teacher is not allowed to use the decredfish-12/8/2004
39God, American History and a Fifth-Grade Class By DEAN E. MURPHY Published: Decredfish-12/8/2004
38Battle over God in U.S. history class Cupertino teacher sues to tell role of Chredfish-12/8/2004
37blood pressure to high .. gotta shut down for now ..Gersh Avery-12/7/2004
36BTW .. I've told folks for many years that "Thou shalt not kill" wGersh Avery-12/7/2004
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):