Non-Tech
|
|
CFA Vs. Columbia Business School Vs. Pure Self-education
|
| An SI Board Since February 2013 |
| Posts |
SubjectMarks |
Bans |
| 0 |
0 |
0
|
| Emcee:
BenUK
|
Type:
Moderated
|
|
Hi all, pretty new to SI + was hoping to get a bit of a poll going on which method of education you would choose if you could do either three of these routes. (A brief background: built up a good pot of cash to invest, read many value investing books, but not seriously got into it yet - but I want to begin on a part-time basis now)
Which one would really help the most with advancing your ability as a value investor? The CFA looks like it covers all areas, but is heavy on areas that very successful value investors frown upon (EMT, CAPM, etc.). Columbia Business School offer a dedicated value investing course (when accompanied by an MBA) - is this something that could be beneficial? Or pure self-education - reading books and growing your own ability (which I know can be done alongside the other two routes, but as a method of 'pure' study on its own). What do you think?
1) CFA
2) Columbia Business School
3) Pure Self-Education
...and why?
Ben
|
|
|
