Do you realize how many posts you have submitted which includes a demand from you for an apology from me?
first: you have no credibility with me. you lie. i am responding since once again, your type needs the extended explanations. more importantly, because you are twisting words as it is your practice.
i believe the number is one. the first one. and they were not "demands" they were requests. there is a difference... look it up, it is in the dictionary.
Message 15138503
the precise words are these:
i really do not want to engage neither you nor anyone else in this "debate" or anything similar, as my time is more valuable. i.e. i rather spend it reading investment related issues.
what forced me to post this is the insult to Poet above.
i know you are a reasonable person. i know, in person, you would have never said that. and i know, in person if i had been present and you would have said it, i would have politely asked you to apologize.
and i am sure you would have, because i know you are someone of quality in the human being department.
thank you for reading this.
please point to me where, in the above or in my post, the word "demand" is, (or where such intent exists).
in this one, i simply answer your questions and reaffirm what had happen. I DID NOT ASK YOU AGAIN.
Message 15138597
i never said you should NOT post anything you wish.
i simply requested for you to reconsider. i clearly see i failed. for that i am sorry, but there is nothing i can do. only you can change that. i can not "force" you.
in re: the PM. once again you are mistaken.
again, show me the word "demand"
you must have sent me six or more ranting private messages in the past few days and over the weekend, and Bob here at SI can verify that if you lost count.....
moi ? lost count of PM's in this matter ? see why you have lost credibility with me ?
first off, i do not need Bob's assistance. i know what i have written, 9 PM's to you (and you have written an equal amount), i have them all saved. no rantings. factual stuff proving you wrong and answering YOUR questions
"past few days" "over the weekend" ? come on GZ... you do not know how to count"? the first one was on Sunday Jan 7/2001 @ 5:54 PM the last one, (where i told you to STOP contacting me) was Jan 8/2001 @ 5:16 PM
I have all the copies. surely, even YOU have to admit that it could not have been more that said 24 hour period, since the whole damned thing began with YOUR INSULT !! (Sunday afternoon.)
guess what? that makes it LESS THAN 24 hours. so tell me how do you define that ? do you call it "twisting words" or "enhancing the truth", or "oops i do not have my facts together "? or is it lying ?
here is the definition.
_________________________________________________________
Main Entry: 3lie
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): lied; ly·ing /'lI-i[ng]/
Etymology: Middle English, from Old English lEogan; akin to Old High German liogan to lie, Old Church Slavonic lugati
Date: before 12th century
intransitive senses
1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive
2 : to create a false or misleading impression
________________________________________________________
i have also reviewed the PM's. all of them. the first one is to answer another question you put to me, to show you (as you had requested), what had i said to YYB in reference to a post of hers. remember at this time i had already been banned by your thread honcho.
in your response, you claimed that Poet had said something "more" in addition to what was written in the copy you had received from me. i proceeded to prove you wrong, AND you showed no evidence of your claim.
why did i send you such material ?
because you asked me how could i "know" something i had not read.
why had i read it already ?
because Poet made it public. remember i even showed you the time schedule... here, read it again, this was writen by me to you:
______________________________________________
you know GZ, twice disingenuous, ceases to be a coincidence.
either that, or you must really think i am quite an idiot.
the copy below (of your PM to Poet made public) is the reason why i made my decision as you asked me above.
I HAD SEEN THE COMMENT before i posted to you. that's why I knew. she posted it at 10:36 AM my post to you (the one you are making the above comment was made to you @ 12.52 PM that is about 2.5 hrs LATER.
i can no longer give you the benefit of the doubt.
__________________________________________________________
then you later admitted (contrary to what you had told me in YOUR PM to me), that yes, indeed, in your recollection, what Poet had posted was ALL of the contents of her PM to you.
you want the links ? i have them, but i think i have proven my case already.
i can copy verbatim what you said about Poet, which was not very nice of you btw. i doubt you would want me to copy that.
clearly, that was a provocation, such as the post to which i am responding, is as well.
then there were 2 more (which in this instance YOU initiated), in spite of the fact that i had asked you to stop communicating with me. after that i put you on PM ignore.
as for the rest of the posts in which i make a reference to that one original one, i have no idea, i lost count of the numerous requests for explanations and tauntings for debate from a number of your friends. so if you need to know why don't you ask them.
all of them have been "explanations" to your mates who kept asking me to debate them and harassing me for explanations since "they can't get it" in the first try (being that they seem to be dense). so i had to repeat as an explanation, not as a request... and NEVER as a DEMAND, why was it that i went and posted at the RWT
ah i forget, you and your comrades cannot distinguish the difference between an apology and a "retractment", only so the word twisting to attempt to make your pathetic cases look "better". so why not change my word "request" to a "demand". right ? sorry... try with someone else.
the PM's indeed... why ?
in response to YOURS and proving you that what you were pretending to pass as the truth was not the truth, as simple as that. and proved i did. they are all there in black and white and saved for posterity.
look up the definitions i posted them for you to see the differences.
turns out, you are denser than them. in all my explanations i did not mentioned enough the fact that you are a liar, as i can attest by your very own PM's to me. which btw i have you turned off for PM given that you did not seem to stop.
so...
sorry Zero, your provocative skills are really lacking.
next time you ought to try the pink camouflage and a tutu, maybe they will confuse you with a ballerina or a flamingo. and in so doing you may succeed in the next joy ride you announce.
as for the rest of your rubbish... i have no obligation to explain anything to you, i can do as i please. in the very same way you yourself told me that you are free to post exactly what you did, attacking and insulting after you were caught red handed in your game. worse, then you felt "hurt" because you did not like the result of your own game. the purple camouflage could also be of use, since the "hurt" feeling would be more intense in the darker tone.
so where do you fit in? And who invited you?
aah what hypocrisy !! did you NOT read my first post to you ? what's the matter ? did i step on a raw nerve ?
but wait... before i answer that, why should i ?
i mean... let me put it this way... when you went to the LWP in your little joy ride... (assuming you had read the thread header, after all... THAT would have been the smart thing to do...) I ASK YOU...
where do you fit in? And who invited you?
you mean... you have the right as you yourself told me that you are free to express whatever is it that you feel like ? and i have to justify myself in your eyes ? you are free to execute whatever joy ride, you may wish, but i cannot ?
tscht, tscht.. that does not sound fair to me. does it to you ? ah... it must be the "right wing" way... or is it the "grandpa' toscano tradition" ?
did i ask you for explanations ? i do not think so... all i did ... well, you know what is it that i did. you are liable to count THIS explanation as ANOTHER DEMAND FOR AN APOLOGY... boy.. you are truly pathetic.
so.. in short, i owe you no explanations whatsoever of my actions or my posts. as simple as that. you know what ? you are leaking badly. i have no idea how is it that you process your thoughts, but i have no reason to give you or anybody else any explanations whatsoever. (that is a repeat to see if you "get it").
since the incident took place, i have not seek neither you, nor your mates, yet you and your comrades continue with your taunting charade. don't you think it is time to stop your silly idiocy ?
go back to the pigpen, i do not go there anymore, what is the fascination with you people to come to this side of the world... are you on a "mission impossible" to taunt or convert ?
sorry, the dark ages and inquisition are long gone. it truly would be best if you keep to yourselves over there, the self-praise helps your badly eroded ego... yet you guys keep coming for more ...
spell dense for me please...
________
p.s. i have saved every one of your PM's to me, if you need to revise them, (so your memory does not get confused), i will post them here if you so wish, then we can go over them in detail to se, how many were:
1. requests,
2. demands,
3. used as reference to prove the facts. (tscht, tscht.)
i have them all saved.
p.s. (2) good thing you are not a lawyer, otherwise you would be ... what ? a public defender ?
_______________________________________
please do not post to me again. |
