To: John F. Dowd who wrote (23718 ) 6/6/1999 9:58:00 PM From: Sir Francis Drake Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
JFD - I understand your point, and you are right in so far as government interference is concerned. In the real world, it usually backfires. The argument "for" AG "meddling" in the equity market valuations, is part of the same justification as his overall responsibility to "manage" the economy. Back in the old days, controlling money supply and setting interest rates were enough leverage to "smooth out" the business cycle. Today the equity market is such an important factor in driving the cycle, that AG feels it necessary to address himself to this lever. The problem for him is that the tools he has traditionally used have somewhat weakened, and now in order to do his job the way he was able to do in the past, he must address himself to this factor - market valuations. Is this right or wrong? Basically, its the same argument as to whether the FED (or government in general) should attempt to "manage" the business cycle at all. The "purists" will say no - hands off... but that means hands off from ALL attempts to control the cycle. If you say that there is some place for such management, then by extension, one could argue for AG facing the new reality that now market valuations are a critical tool, as they are as important if not a more important factor in driving inflation as interest rates. Obviously this is on a more "macro" level of the overall market, and not individual issues, a distinction that is a bit more than academic. I think the consensus is that that on balance, AG is not wrong to keep an eye on the markets. The devil is of course, as always, in the details. He has a powerful new tool at his disposal - will he know how to use it, and will he use it well? Time will tell. Morgan