Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (61466)	6/11/1999 12:54:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572073

Tench - RE: "we're also awaiting actual benchmark scores, not just the "percentages" . Heheh. Intel actually has to worry about a competing X86 processor!

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (61466)	6/11/1999 12:59:00 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1572073

Re: "Elmer, we're also awaiting actual benchmark scores, not just the "percentages". I still think Dirk Meyer has no reason to exaggerate, though, especially when the K7 is this close to release. " I don't think he is falsifying the results if that's what you mean but there is a 3.4% difference between published results for a 550MHz Xeon so how do you know which one he's comparing to? That goes a long way to close the 5% gap. EP