Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d:oug who wrote (6475)	6/16/1999 10:41:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81980

<<Ron is much more dangerous than a bad person wanting to destroy and hurt others, as Ron believes he is correct and good will happen only under his views being inacted as rules or the law of the land.>> Doug, I'm no different than most other people who post out here. Bill Murphy certainly believes he is correct and that some major criminal act is underway. I'm just stating the other side. And you bet I feel I'm correct since I HAVE YET to see one gold enthusiast offer up a logical case for gold, other than to discuss anti-corrosive qualities or any other straw-man argument they can pull of their fourth point of contact. Anyone out here who can make a convincing argument that gold is not, in fact, subsidized by the CBs and global taxpayers is welcome to have at it, and to let the anonymous readers of this thread decide who's arguments have more merit. It is a real travesty that so many people have bought into this Y2K/gold argument. In fact, it is tantamount to outright fraud in my opinion. I almost bought into it myself last year when I heard more and more people discussing deciding to buy physical gold. I just think that all sides deserve to be discussed so anyone reading can make their own informed investment decision. Regards, Ron

To: d:oug who wrote (6475)	6/17/1999 12:19:00 AM
From: Zardoz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81980

Way OT: Most can hit NEXT now. <Hutch is much more dangerous than a bad person wanting to destroy and hurt others, as Hutch believes he is correct and good will happen only under his views being inacted as rules or the law of the land.> The goal of my prior posts was to flush out you and Ron so that those on this thread could get a glimpse of what you and Ron really want to do. Well, did you achieve your goals. My world would be a wonderful place. Any crime equal to or higher then assault one would have but one sentence: death. There would be no camera's on the street... free speech would be encourage. Opposing thoughts would not be trounced on with out people applying logic as responses. Ron and I fulfill a need, balance. Otherwise we might as well just cheer. Buy, buy and buy that's how overvalueation is achieved. To many people are wasting their time trying to find out what others do for their business. This place has taken on the air of a hollywood blacklist, with a bias towards gold equity. Some are long, some are short... but it seems that those who try to explain the element, suffer from the taunting, hostility, and innuendos. Who cares whom works where... "who do you work for? Kinda rude eh?" If a question insults you, say so, if an elements offend you say so. No one says you MUST believe anything anyone says. But to suggest that you are doing a service to the thread in attempting to expose what, frauds, liars, deception? Then you truly have much more time on your hands then we suspect... "why, did you loose your job?" See how my kingdom works, so many questions, so little time. If you can't debate on an equal level, why must you subjugate the thread. No one expects you to answer ever question. But to accuse, just don't cut it. PS: I'm better at sarcasim then you are. Because I think you are a genius, and in my kingdom, you would be placed under glass as an exemplarily citizen. heheheh [8?)

To: d:oug who wrote (6475)	6/17/1999 12:32:00 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 81980

The goal of my prior posts was to flush out you and Ron so that those on this thread could get a glimpse of what you and Ron really want to do. Hmmm... a latter day Torquemada?? To Thread: Ask yourself, if Hutch and Ron were in charge of a group of people, and they put into key positions of the courts and police only those who would obey them without question, then would you feel it safe and ok to voice out loud an opinion contrary to theirs ? Somehow I feel like I'm the one being persecuted here. I'm not telling anyone not to buy gold. I'm just voicing the other side which so many folks like Bill Murphy, DoubleD, and Richard seem not to want to be discussed. It's almost as if they're afraid to hear others voice an opposing view and will do anything to impugn any people not spouting GATA's party line. So who is abridging who's 1st amendment rights here?? Cause it certainly ain't me. Regards, Ron