Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (31367)	6/19/1999 12:02:00 AM
From: count gold	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

JDN is a man I respect deeply... he may be right that TAVA should be valued much higher than $8.. On the other hand, one of the important rules that an investor has to learn is never fall in love with a stock..... OK to fall in love with a company....but not its stock. By the same token, we must avoid falling in hate with a stock. There are tons of exciting stocks out there for smart people like those on this thread... when I bailed from TAVA at 7 1/4 shortly after "the announcement" it wasnt hard to come up with some growing companies such as LSI, QCOM and ZAPP which have risen over 20% over the past month or so and who appear to have a bright future in their respective niche. JDN...you have my utmost respect...your determination is worthy of an old Marine...you have stayed the course..... but remember...the name of the game is to increase wealth.... screw JJ and the horse he rode in on.... Unless you have tax issues take the 7 1/2 from TAVA and find a company or two that you can be proud of in a growing economy and double your money in a year or so... you can still raise hell by voting NO... and remember to store some food, batteries and water.... Best to All, CG

To: JDN who wrote (31367)	6/19/1999 12:24:00 AM
From: Runner	Respond to of 31646

"The only thing more appropriate would be if TAVA were a screw factory." Or if you were reaching for the K.Y. jelly, and grabbed the Bengay instead. Now that would be a hot screwing! Runner

To: JDN who wrote (31367)	6/19/1999 6:08:00 PM
From: Jack Zahran	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

JDN: Historical Factors Weighing it down???! It is just the opposite. When a company is turned around so quickly and coming with such negative odds against it, it only emphasizes its tremendous value. History indicates: 1. That the company eliminated it's losses. 2. Significantly improved its capital structure. 3. Grew to National Market Stature virtually overnight. 4. Within a short period of time turned itself into a strong earner while sustaining record topline growth in its industry. 5. Leveraged its Y2K business to transition into Post Y2K powerhouse with a who's who of clientelle. In particular poised to benefit from supply-chain business as well as a backlog of core business that was held up from the Y2K problem. A companies value is not based on retired old businesses, but on the current and future growth. Any reasonable person would conclude likewise, it's common sense.