To: LindyBill who wrote (2741 ) 6/19/1999 12:59:00 PM From: red jinn Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 54805
Lindy: i'm a lurker, have been out of the country for a while, and am trying to catch up on the posts, and i wanted to let you know (and others have already) that your story friday was inspirational and you told it without losing any couth, imo. but i feel i should comment on (really supplement) your statement that you have been "succesful" b/c of: "The core values that have made America great. The use of reason, The protection of Individual rights, and the use of Science and Technology that came out of the first two, which has made America the greatest Civilization the world has ever seen." There's probably a lot we'd agree on, but here's the supplement: if you read the u.s. constitution as originally drafted, i.e., without the bill of rights, it is almost entirely directions for a process, e.g., you must be 25 before you can run for congress, the senate must approve treaties by 2/3 vote, congress shall have the power to do x, y, and z, but it doesn't have to, etc. it's a how-to manual, but not a what, so to speak. in fact, unlike every other constitution ever written -- look at the russian constitution, which guaranteed everyone the right to a job, healthcare, religious freedom, etc. ad nauseum -- our constitution uses the word "right" only once once. it's in article I, Section 8, where it says that "congress shall ... to promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts, [secure] for limited Times to Authors and Inventors, the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." that is the genesis of our intellectual property laws (and geo. washington signed the first patent, the inventor of which is buried about 1/2 mile from where i live, in 1792). and while i am constantly amazed at our founders the more i know about them, i think that it is extraordinary that these gentlemen, who counted their wealth in slaves, wheatfields, and specie, said we're not protecting that kind of tangible property specifically. no, we're going to protect the property of the mind - which, admittedly, they had plenty of - and nothing else. of course the chinese are just beginning to recognize that ideas can be an individual's property only 200 or so years later. i'm an intellectual property lawyer, and i use this story in about every speech i give to remind the audience of what a remarkable country they live in (and indirectly, if they make the connection, how lucky they are). 'nuff said. best regards and thanks to all who contribute on this thread. red jinn