Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: V. who wrote (6166)	6/20/1999 12:04:00 AM
From: Dudley-ess DoWrong	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32939

<<<< I also don't think that when he or anyone else is going down the line when there are 2 million messages in the inbox, that's he's thinking, "Hmmm... let me word this in such a way as to be sure that no one will misunderstand, misinterpret, mistake, miscommunicate... " :)>>>>> Then he would be a poor C.E.O. Any C.E.O. who is making a post for the whole world to see , including lawyers and the media...about a controversy that is brewing ...better damn well carefully consider what he is going to say.

To: V. who wrote (6166)	6/20/1999 12:12:00 AM
From: Tom_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32939

Svejk and Horowitz posts... V, Re-reading Svejk's post to Russ, it's clear to me that Svejk did not "complain to him about banner ads." Svejk referred instead to "Permanent datek.com or other ads on SI member pages?" and "The datek.com ad,". Russ's response, on the other hand, was totally focused on banner ads. He may have missed the distinction. OTOH, he may not have. It would be where he would want to focus. Best wishes, Tom