Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Kenneth Starr denies his probe was politically motivated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (187)	6/25/1999 11:17:00 AM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 470

Juries shouldn't have "choices", they should follow the law Then why have them at all? The judge knows more about the law than any jury. dumbed down, "profiled" group of idiots I've been on several juries and to some extent I have to agree with you. The experience was a farce. The civil courts function much better (after all it's money and not law at stake). The juries should be much better informed, they should do the principal questioning of witnesses. I wouldn't want a sweeping sudden reform, just some steady progress with the ability to back up and modify when problems are found. TP