Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Kenneth Starr denies his probe was politically motivated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: C Kahn who wrote (415)	6/30/1999 8:09:00 AM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 470

Good riddance to a very bad and unconstitutional law. JLA

To: C Kahn who wrote (415)	6/30/1999 8:18:00 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 470

The law as written is badly flawed. There should be some constraints and/or limitations added so the breadth and scope of power does not run unbridled. I think to scrap it entirely would be a mistake, unless it is so badly flawed we need to just start over. I don't think we can go back to having the justice dept. overseeing the white house, but what the best alternative is I don't know.

To: C Kahn who wrote (415)	6/30/1999 9:35:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 470

I have been against it for years, and see no reason to change my mind. On the "public trust" issue, it hasn't done much good, has it?

To: C Kahn who wrote (415)	7/1/1999 3:43:00 PM
From: C Kahn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 470

I see that most of the hostile people who only want to argue and insult, have gone on to other threads, leaving the people who would like a civilized debate to post here. Or maybe they wouldn't take the time to read post #415, which makes me wonder if they are more concerned with throwing insults than being well informed about current issues.