Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Epstein who wrote (12717)	7/3/1999 3:04:00 PM
From: Tickertype	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Bill, you may appreciate Larry's opinions, but why does he have to repeat them about 57 times? We've all seen them , over and over, and you may buy into them while many of us won't, but that doesn't change even though the endless repetition goes on forever. It reminds me of a kid in school being made to write the same thing 100 times on the black board for punishment. To the longs: Yesterday we must have set a new record for the greatest number of useless posts. Everyone responding to the psychologically impaired one like trout rising to a dry fly. C'mon guys, ignore the dogpound types and lets return this thread to the way it used to be before the dark vaders invaded it. And a good 4th of July to all! - T -

To: William Epstein who wrote (12717)	7/3/1999 8:10:00 PM
From: Pallisard	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

William, being a paid schill DOES change the value of his descriptions. Larry misquotes using subtle changes in text that will support a bearish point of view. That's what he's paid for. And then he uses the old trick of repetition ad infinitum to try to MAKE IT SO. All his posts become bait to require the rest of the board to respond, and so he keeps up the continuous negative ranting to cast doubt in the minds of other people who always "walk in" on a negative spin. Rich Wolf just pointed out an example of all this. Just read his past and present posts under the "noway" ID on Yahoo, if you really are long and interested in Valence as a rewarding speculation.