SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: quidditch who wrote (38306)8/19/1999 7:43:00 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Art's "Intelligent Regulators": <
Message #38307 from steven malsin at Aug 19 1999 7:15PM
NXTL and NEXTWAVE get more bizarre by the day. It it now clear that my earlier post presaged exactly what's going on--potential third party claims against NXTL's being awarded C-Block spectrum and the possibility of constitutional claims being raised on separation of powers principles.
>

What a mess they made!

Mqurice




To: quidditch who wrote (38306)8/19/1999 8:20:00 PM
From: KyrosL  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 152472
 
Perhaps the FCC is trying to prevent the following scenario:

1. Submit a very high bid and, therefore, get the spectrum
2. Declare bankruptcy, and renegotiate the bid to a small fraction of the original bid.
3. Emerge from bankruptcy with a highly valuable bargain-basement priced spectrum and clean up.

I think the FCC is trying to protect the interests of the taxpayers here. The right way to resolve this is to redo the auction and allow everybody to bid.



To: quidditch who wrote (38306)8/19/1999 9:28:00 PM
From: DaveMG  Respond to of 152472
 
<Don't think this has been posted.

Is it plausible that Nextwave would be considering any alternatives to CDMA2000? Perhaps this really is the reason for NKriplani raising some cash? And what the hell is NXTL's agenda? Maybe they hoped to split the markets with Sprint and ATT , anything to ward off yet another nationwide high speed network? >...DMG

rcrnews.com

Nextel?s pursuit of NextWave raises eyebrows

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Lynnette Luna
News that Nextel Communications Inc. received government approval to pursue 95 personal communications services licenses held by bankrupt designated entity NextWave Telecom Inc. dumbfounded and angered several large carriers last week and put into question whether the Federal Communications Commission brokered a back-door deal with the enhanced specialized mobile radio operator.

It is an issue that may have far-reaching consequences for the FCC, consequences that could include congressional hearings on the issue, said sources close to the matter. The FCC and Nextel did not return repeated calls for comment by RCR?s press time.

Nextel announced last week it had reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice and the FCC, receiving their endorsement to obtain spectrum entangled in NextWave?s bankruptcy proceedings. Nextel said it already has contacted representatives of NextWave?s creditors for a possible deal.

NextWave, however, is pursuing its own reorganization plans to offer PCS service.

NextWave claims Nextel failed to file its plan with the court and is prohibited by law from doing so or soliciting votes on any plan of reorganization that doesn?t have court-approved disclosure.

Late Friday, NextWave?s bankruptcy court granted a preliminary injunction against Nextel, banning it from contacting NextWave?s creditors without the court?s approval. Nextel must appear before the court Aug. 25 to show cause as to why a permanent injunction shouldn?t be issued against it.

It?s unclear what type of agreements Nextel reached with the government entities because the FCC and DOJ will not disclose them. But the agreements could violate the FCC?s own rules and procedures and the intent Congress has in giving small businesses a chance to compete in the mobile-phone industry.

??Nextel made an offer, and we did agree to it,?? said Chris Watne, spokeswoman with the DOJ. ??We said that we?d support a reorganization plan consistent with the terms presented in the term sheets.??

Late last week, carriers were asking why the FCC gave special consideration to Nextel?a company considered too large to qualify as a C-block license holder?and without soliciting any public comment on the issue. The FCC on two occasions has denied Nextel?s request to bid for C-block spectrum.

??If the FCC is signaling a change to the very specific rules for PCS C- and F-block license eligibility, then the FCC should change those rules for all large wireless carriers,?? said Tom Murphy, director of media relations with Sprint PCS, the country?s largest pure-play PCS operator. ??If the FCC plans to modify the eligibility criteria for the NextWave licenses, then Sprint PCS would also be interested in acquiring NextWave?s PCS licenses. Sprint PCS will pursue everything in its power to see that our interests are protected and that we have the opportunity to acquire additional spectrum should it become available to large carriers.??

??It?s vital that the FCC restore public confidence in explaining what happened and what procedures it went through,?? said a spokesman with a large cellular carrier. ??We?d like to see the commission clarify whether it?s no longer requiring its traditional eligibility criteria for the C-block spectrum. If they are lifting the criteria, then there is a strong public interest in opening up the process ... It would be quite an incredible miscarriage if this was delivered just to Nextel.??

The FCC?s motive is puzzling to many industry insiders. The commission does not have much to gain financially in allowing Nextel to pursue NextWave?s licenses nor is it likely Nextel could build out the licenses before NextWave?s planned time frame.

The FCC has been frustrated that C-block licensees have run to bankruptcy courts for relief rather than working out payments with the commission. The FCC once found favor with the Clinton administration for raking in more than $7 billion in PCS auction bids, but now is finding itself on the losing end of a failed C-block auction process. The top three bidders in the C-block auction, including NextWave, have filed for bankruptcy, and all have received favorable rulings and significant discounts on license fees.

Today, NextWave?s licenses are under the jurisdiction of a federal bankruptcy court in New York as part of a bankruptcy proceeding NextWave initiated last year. A federal district court recently affirmed an earlier ruling that cut NextWave?s debt by $3 billion, requiring NextWave, which holds 95 basic trading area licenses covering 163 million pops, to pay the FCC $1 billion. Any agreement between Nextel and NextWave?s creditors is unlikely to give the commission more than $1 billion in license fees.

NextWave?s proposed plan for reorganization is scheduled for a confirmation hearing on Sept. 8 with the bankruptcy court. The plan is based on more than $750 million of new working capital investment and offers negotiated with various equipment vendors willing to provide up to $2 billion in initial network equipment purchases to build out a nationwide Internet Protocol, packet-switched, high-speed data and voice network, said NextWave in a press statement. If the bankruptcy court confirms the plan, NextWave said its licenses will be paid for in full. NextWave said its reselling strategy will allow a large number of new service providers to enter the market.

Nationwide operator Nextel hasn?t made clear what it would do with the spectrum or when it would build out the licenses, only saying in a press release it believes its ??existing spectrum position is ample to meet the needs of its current business plan. Access to the NextWave spectrum would allow Nextel greater flexibility in its pursuit of new strategic initiatives and in the deployment of future generations of wireless and telecommunications services.??

Sources close to Nextel and NextWave say Nextel has approached certain creditor representatives and presented them with a reorganization plan. The creditors could decide next week if they wish to pursue this option.

NextWave claims Nextel failed to file its plan with the court and is prohibited by law from doing so or soliciting votes on any plan of reorganization not filed that doesn?t have court-approved disclosure.

show cause as to why the court shouldn?t issue a permanent injunction.

It?s unclear what type of agreements Nextel reached with the government entities because the FCC and DOJ will not disclose them. NextWave?s bankruptcy court has ordered Nextel to provide NextWave with a copy of all agreements reached with the DOJ and the FCC.

The agreements could violate the FCC?s own rules and procedures and the intent Congress has in giving small businesses a chance to compete in the mobile-phone industry.

??Nextel made an offer, and we did agree to it,?? said Chris Watne, spokeswoman with the DOJ. ??We said that we?d support a reorganization plan consistent with the terms presented in the term sheets.??

Late last week, carriers were asking why the FCC gave special consideration to Nextel?a company considered too large to qualify as a C-block license holder?without soliciting any public comment on the issue. The FCC on two occasions has denied Nextel?s request to bid for C-block spectrum.

??If the FCC is signaling a change to the very specific rules for PCS C- and F-block license eligibility, then the FCC should change those rules for all large wireless carriers,?? said Tom Murphy, director of media relations with Sprint PCS, the country?s largest pure-play PCS operator. ??If the FCC plans to modify the eligibility criteria for the NextWave licenses, then Sprint PCS would also be interested in acquiring NextWave?s PCS licenses. Sprint PCS will pursue everything in its power to see that our interests are protected and that we have the opportunity to acquire additional spectrum should it become available to large carriers.??

??It?s vital that the FCC restore public confidence in explaining what happened and what procedures it went through,?? said a spokesman with a large cellular carrier. ??We?d like to see the commission clarify whether it?s no longer requiring its traditional eligibility criteria for the C-block spectrum. If they are lifting the criteria, then there is a strong public interest in opening up the process ... It would be quite an incredible miscarriage if this was delivered just to Nextel.??

The FCC?s motive is puzzling to many industry insiders. The commission does not have much to gain financially in allowing Nextel to pursue NextWave?s licenses, nor is it likely Nextel could build out the licenses before NextWave?s planned time frame.

The FCC has been frustrated that C-block licensees have run to bankruptcy courts for relief rather than working out payments with the commission. The FCC once found favor with the Clinton administration for raking in more than $7 billion in PCS auction bids, but now is finding itself on the losing end of a failed C-block auction process. The top three bidders in the C-block auction, including NextWave, have filed for bankruptcy, and all have received favorable rulings and significant discounts on license fees.

Today, NextWave?s licenses are under the jurisdiction of a federal bankruptcy court in New York as part of a bankruptcy proceeding NextWave initiated last year. A federal district court recently affirmed an earlier ruling that cut NextWave?s debt by $3 billion, requiring NextWave, which holds 95 basic trading area licenses covering 163 million pops, to pay the FCC $1 billion. Any agreement between Nextel and NextWave?s creditors is unlikely to give the commission more than $1 billion in license fees.

NextWave?s proposed plan for reorganization is scheduled for a confirmation hearing on Sept. 8 with the bankruptcy court. The plan is based on more than $750 million of new working capital investment and offers negotiated with various equipment vendors willing to provide up to $2 billion in initial network equipment purchases to build out a nationwide Internet Protocol, packet-switched, high-speed data and voice network, said NextWave in a press statement. If the bankruptcy court confirms the plan, NextWave said its licenses will be paid for in full. NextWave said its reselling strategy will allow a large number of new service providers to enter the market.

Nationwide operator Nextel hasn?t made clear what it would do with the spectrum or when it would build out the licenses, only saying in a press release it believes its ??existing spectrum position is ample to meet the needs of its current business plan. Access to the NextWave spectrum would allow Nextel greater flexibility in its pursuit of new strategic initiatives and in the deployment of future generations of wireless and telecommunications services.??



To: quidditch who wrote (38306)8/19/1999 10:05:00 PM
From: DaveMG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
Steven..

A few more thoughts.. Perhaps what's going on is a confluence of NXTL and FCC interests. AS has been suggested, the FCC now looks "real bad", the 7 bil that they once raised slipping through their fingers. If only they could reset the rules... NXTL OTOH surely DOES NOT want to see Nextwave field a brand spanking new 3G network, whatever the stripe. By demonstrating their willingness to pay more than Nextwave they might help the FCC argue for a renegociation of the rules. If NXTL ultimately has to share the spectrum with all the other big guys, so what, at least no one player gets it's hands on the spectrum.. Make any sense?

Sure seems NEXTWAVE is rising!

Imagine what a BRAND NEW 3G CDMA NETWORK would do for Q...

Dave