To: PatP who wrote (40564 ) 8/22/1999 6:28:00 PM From: PCModem Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 43774
"BTW, IMO jhild is usually right. He does good research. " Hold on there! The question is this: What is j "usually right" about? When it comes to PABN, what "good research" are you referring to? The missing R? A major find! (not sure if you can call something that is "missing" a "find" but you know what I mean!) Oh NO! wait, he didn't find that one. never mind. The missing $? Amazing feat of research! and utterly meaningless. What other FACTS about this company or its management, their activities etc., has j turned up which have ANYTHING whatsoever to do with the company's business? Well let's see. Hang on, I've almost got it. Something is coming...it is almost here...OH YES! j declared that the company is not violating any rules of the SEC! ANOTHER MAJOR DISCOVERY! Now, there must be something else. I'm sure there is. I just can't think of anything. I'm sure someone out there can help me out on this one. In the meantime... You are the second one to make this kind of a comment regarding j's research abilities (ISOMAN was the first as I recall). I'm unconvinced. I mean j has been working on PABN for about a year now, right? If j is so good why hasn't he found anything? Now, there's a real question for ya!If j is so good why hasn't he found anything? Cele 16 (on RB) discovered the PPM had been filed.If j is so good why hasn't he found anything? Kerry found the PPM on the anonymous geocities site.If j is so good why hasn't he found anything? You, lorriestar (from RB) and joey got us the information about the auditors. If j is so good why hasn't he found anything? The possible answers are: 1. j is not really good at research. Instead, j is a parasite, making "mud pies" of the "dirt" others "dig up." 2. j is good at research, there is simply nothing bad to find. 3. both: j is a parasite and there is simply nothing bad to find. For those who are going to run out and try to find examples of j's research on PABN and its management, any qualified statements don't count. Thus "IMHO," "I guess," "I think," "it seems to me," "maybe," etc., does not indicate a research find, instead it is a guess or an opinion. Try to stick with the PABN thread. After a year of obsessive harassment of the investors here, I think there is enough material to prove it one way or the other. Besides a glance at the MTEI thread shows Mr. Research misleading the poor shareholders there by trying to get them to look in San Diego for Mr. Tow, instead of Newport Beach, "Mr. Research" strikes again, LOL. (Makes me wonder how much he got paid for that little bit of "story telling"...?! see #reply-10590853 and the discussion immediately before and after it.) From what I can recall, so far j has not been right once about anything that he has come up with himself (and the only thing he has come up with himself was the missing $). Certainly j has been very inventive with his suggestions and accusations of wrong doing and bad connections (which don't connect, but j does not let little details like that bother him!). In the j universe that may be sufficient to win the accolades of others but in the real world I don't think they are justified. Pat, thanks for the information concerning the auditors! Like most of the information which eventually turns up here, it simply provides further proof of the legitimacy of those involved with this business. THANK YOU!!! In any case, I'm sure you have a factual basis for your opinion regarding j's research abilities. But I hope PABN doesn't go to the dogs.... I like dogs! I like PABN. (I like dogs too, grin) PCM GO PABN!!!