Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Beta Site Launch - 7/01/99 -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BryanB who wrote (2029)	9/15/1999 1:12:00 PM
From: John Biddle	Respond to of 2340

Thanks for your quick attention.

To: BryanB who wrote (2029)	9/15/1999 5:31:00 PM
From: Cisco	Respond to of 2340

Bryan, here are some more examples of links that don't work on the NEW SI. Since these links are the backbone of this new thread, it makes the thread useless for those using only the New SI! The links are contained in the following two posts. I think you will see how important these links are to the thread: Message 11261040 Message 11218481 The link in question is: techstocks.com IF the New SI would just let us link back to the Classic, it would eliminate the need for: Subject 30563 Thanks, Cisco

To: BryanB who wrote (2029)	9/15/1999 6:25:00 PM
From: Cisco	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 2340

Now to a more serious subject. As I am sure you are aware during the last couple of days SI was used as an illegal means to pump a stock by 3 separate aliases (most likely the same person). They posted 275 messages in a matter of hours of becoming members of SI. By no accident the stock volume went up over 700% from the previous day and they probably walked away with at least a 25% increase on their money for one day's work. Not a bad return on their membership fee. If they are allowed to walk away with just a suspension of membership, what keeps them or some other group from doing the same thing again? It is very tempting to do the same thing. Work 3 days out of the year, and drink lemonade on a beach in Austria the rest of the year! It is clear, that this individual had no intention of agreeing to the terms of use. Their only purpose was to rape the financial resources of SI members. I feel strongly, that since SI knows who these individuals are, that they should report them to the SEC and consider taking legal action against them to discourage future activity of this nature. My understanding from the following post is that Sprint may have already sued some of this group for the same activity. Message 11253633 Could you address the questions I raised here: Message 11247322 Cisco

To: BryanB who wrote (2029)	9/16/1999 3:59:00 AM
From: Volsi Mimir	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2340

I don't get it when i put CTV ANEN GIC SFA and AIRO in for a comparative chart for 80 days I get a chart for 32 days. Tried several times at 100 and 60. same 32 day chart. Interestingly putting in MSFT BA INTC LU GE for 100 days will give you a 100 day chart. : siliconinvestor.com FYI- like you need this! Sure would like an automatically opened portfolio for the button on the top. Keep up the good work c.

To: BryanB who wrote (2029)	9/16/1999 7:36:00 AM
From: Cisco	Respond to of 2340

Missing in Action! Where have all the profiles gone? Member 4591117 Member 3939521 Member 1115520 Member 3165594 Member 947921 Member 3998052 Member 1524751 I found 7 out of 65 profiles I checked didn't work. That would suggest that about 10.7% of the profiles on the New SI don't work! I would have thought that at least the profile for this guy would have worked:<g> unicus.com Cisco