Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M who wrote (3632)	9/16/1999 8:14:00 PM
From: Angelo	Respond to of 10293

If you guys need a referee let me know,I will pay for his bill. Angelo

To: Mike M who wrote (3632)	9/16/1999 11:47:00 PM
From: Mad2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10293

Dear Mike M My, my Mikey you resort to anger, foul language and denial (no its not a river in Egypt). You come here to "support" GUMM, but instead only throw around acqusations that aren't found in fact. You write: I remember the incident in question and it didn't quite happen the way you say it did....Doesn't matter. You are wrong and so is your analysis. You haven't got one bit of the story straight...and you can't spell worth a hoot either. If you think you know something put your money where your mouth is. Your distortions are libel! What I write is based on factual information (unlike your posts). Why don't you bone up on what has been written before you run off and expose your ignorance. The only thing you can criticize is the spelling.......getting desperate eh Mikey. You also claim, I remember that too...and you didn't have a clue then what the company was about....just somebody's recommendation to short....Better lucky than good when you are clueless...! I've followed GUMM for 2 years, longer than your beloved thread has been in existance. No one recomended GUMM as a short to me, period. I've forgotten more about GUMM than your small brain has the capacity to understand. I review many good short opportunities that are posted here as well as other threads but make no decision based on someone elses recomendation as sucessful shorting is not based on luck. Do you also represent your knowledge of GUMM and other companies you tout with the same degree of accuracy you have displayed here? Where are your compelling (based on facts, not opinion) that support a long position in GUMM On my position with GUMM Message 7603673 Message 7670325 Message 7696151 Message 7729635 On the orgin of Dr. Davidsons firm Gel-Tech Message 7565215 Message 7569161 Message 7571742 On the confusion of Gum Tech's representation of Gel-Tech, Biodelivery Message 7571742 Message 7573668 On the available information concerning ZICAM and professional references and verification Message 7576603 Message 7580546 Message 7588097 Message 7588934 Message 7590914 GUMM's deal with Gel-Tech smells of a stock promotion scheme, that was hastily put togeather to prop up the price of GUMM and attract new money. Confusing press releases and conflicting information from consultants all add up to a seat of the pants approach centered around pumping the zicam story. Five years of failure will be followed by ????? We will know shortly, but history has a funny way of repeating itself. With disrespect to you and your worthless opinions, Mad2