Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (41743)	9/17/1999 11:40:00 PM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

And since even one share of Qualcomm is an appreciable investment, investors shouldn't hold their breath for the salvation of a squeeze. ********************************* END. I like how it ended with an idiotic observation. <g>

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (41743)	9/17/1999 11:57:00 PM
From: SpudFarmer	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

There is much to pick at, but, I will spare what you all already know. Just have one thing: Everyone believe Schmitt and borrow my shares to short.....all the way to $300, and I still won't want them back to sell. That OK with you Diamond? Sorry, two things: <investors shouldn't hold their breath for the salvation of a squeeze.> Salvation? What the hell is he talking about? A squeeze doesn't "save" anyone long when a stock is going up. How condesending. I'm refraining from resorting to name calling. OK, I take it back, CBS marketwatch luke warm 'journalism' is welcome. This would be funny if people didn't take him seriously. <I was tempted to write a "Dear shit for brains" type message, but decided against it.> Good for you! You have much better things to use your brain cells for. Like planning the Q-BBQ! That's it! We could have a BBQ at the Q! Or is that Q-much?