Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Miller who wrote (34)	10/5/1999 9:27:00 PM
From: MaryinRed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

You should never have been allowed to join in the first place YOu lied to get in. You certified by joining that you were 18. Now you are known to be 15...or thereabouts. You are a proven lier...and it is against the TOS for you to even be a member An age rule is here for a reason. You have broken it...and now YOU...of all people...are campaigning to keep Anthony out. This is the height of absurdity. YOu should never have been allowed to stay the moment you announced your age. Anyone who follows you...and thinks you have an ounce of credibility..is smoking funny cigarettes.... really.........so if you are so "honorable" the honorable thing is for you to leave...cleanly....or must we rise up...and insist Silicon Investor rid of of children who lie and sign on. answer me....this.....Daniel......why do you think..you should be on? waiting ......Mary

To: Daniel Miller who wrote (34)	10/5/1999 9:38:00 PM
From: .com	Respond to of 1638

You are right; they must stick by their decisions or they are meaningless. I think the biggest reason Tony wants back is that he uses SI to recruit members to his pay site. If he doesn't get the face time on SI (and other boards) then he won't have much recognition which means few subscribers to his pay site.

To: Daniel Miller who wrote (34)	10/5/1999 10:07:00 PM
From: LANCE B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

I FOR ONE THINK THAT A&P IS NEEDED BADLY ON SILICON... last i looked i was in america and it was based on a check and balance system and though he might play on the other side of the street than me,he is very much needed on silicon.. i personally think it is absurd that there needs to be a vote among members to determine the outcome....hmm.let me think,all you hypsters,liars and scammers,do you want someone on silicon that has the guts to tell you are full of crap and might cause your scam to fall back to earth.....hard call...

To: Daniel Miller who wrote (34)	10/6/1999 5:05:00 PM
From: Bruce Denney	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1638

One look at at this thread and I see a minor voting against reinstating a good man. What the hell has happened here, how many of you or your family or friends have ever been given a second chance. If you want to cast stones against simple freedom of opinion, on this forum, and deny Tony another opportunity to enlighten many adults then now is your chance. Go ahead throw that rock up in the air, and just hope it doesn't land on one of you friends who need a chance. regards, BD