Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bruce Denney who wrote (314)	10/6/1999 5:14:00 PM
From: Cisco	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1638

My problem is not with Anthony, it is with the Management of SI that doesn't have the balls to reinstate someone they obviously want to reinstate so instead they put out this farce of a vote so they will have something to wear as a fig leaf! It is my feeling that the decision was made before this vote ever started. Nobody on this thread has been given the information needed to make an informed decision. So why not let a 15 year vote. It ain't going to make any difference anyway. I just want to know who else is going to be given the same privileges?

To: Bruce Denney who wrote (314)	10/6/1999 5:19:00 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 1638

how many of you or your family or friends have ever been given a second chance This is a very good question. I wonder if A@P would give some of the touts that he has attacked a second chance. What about the people that he has threatened with lawsuits (I have no idea if he has ever followed through). What about TokyoMex (or is it "Joe"?)? Is A@P going to embrace the same "clean slate" philosophy that he is asking SI to adopt?