Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Anthony@Pacific Member Vote -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: micky who wrote (802)	10/9/1999 5:53:00 PM
From: A@P Trader	Respond to of 1638

Ive checked their website and you are full of BS

To: micky who wrote (802)	10/9/1999 6:00:00 PM
From: A@P Trader	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1638

You are going to have a major problem, in my opinion. making false and untruthfull statements in an attempt to slander someone is illegal in the USA. I think Anthony will find your remarks very ineresting.

To: micky who wrote (802)	10/9/1999 6:48:00 PM
From: Jack Turner	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1638

Not only that the SEC declared A@P as having a serious mental disorder. His actions on SI clearly display that finding. He abused the boards, he attacked people, he clearly posts misleading and libel statements. SI would be much better of without him. If he is allowed to break the rules and stay on then the same MUST apply to all. He got SEVERAL warnings and ignored them. He is an ego run rite and I want SI to keep his ego somewhere else.

To: micky who wrote (802)	10/9/1999 7:26:00 PM
From: Nazbuster	Respond to of 1638

Lies. Below are the only two results for an "Elgindy" search at NASD. As I have said in other posts, Tony's fines related to his use of a SOES terminal to do trades for his own account while sitting with the auditor he himself invited into the firm. Tony had never operated the order entry terminal (he sold stock on the phone), and didn't realize he was entering SOES orders. (It is a violation of the rules for a broker to use SOES to trade his own account.) Because it was unintentional, NASD kept the fines small and took 4 years to reluctantly apply them because they really had no way to NOT apply them: the auditor witnessed the actions. Here's the text: nasd.com Amr I. Elgindy (Registered Principal, Colleyville, Texas) submitted an Offer of Settlement pursuant to which he was fined $30,000, suspended from association with any NASD member in any principal capacity for one year, suspended from association with any NASD member in any capacity for 30 days, and required to produce a copy of his member firm's implemented written supervisory procedures specifically with respect to overseeing his activities to deter and detect a recurrence of the conduct alleged in the complaint. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Elgindy consented to the described sanctions and to the entry of findings that he caused his member firm to execute 108 orders through SOES for the firm's account. The findings also stated that Elgindy caused his member firm to enter non-bona fide orders through the SelectNetSM System for the firm's account that were either timed out or canceled by Elgindy before they could be executed. Furthermore, the NASD found that Elgindy caused trades reported to ACT to be canceled by failing to acknowledge or confirm such trades. The NASD also determined that Elgindy failed to ensure that his member firm establish, maintain, and enforce supervisory procedures that would have enabled the firm to deter and detect the above conduct. nasd.com Individuals Whose Registrations Were Revoked For Failure To Pay Fines, Costs And/Or Provide Proof Of Restitution In Connection With Violations Elgindy, Amr I., Colleyville, Texas (September 18, 1998)