SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WCOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony Wong who wrote (5266)10/11/1999 3:33:00 PM
From: MGV  Respond to of 11568
 
BellSouth is rumored to have an interest as well.



To: Anthony Wong who wrote (5266)10/11/1999 3:37:00 PM
From: Paul Reuben  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11568
 
Telecom giants could wield big hammer

zdnet.com



To: Anthony Wong who wrote (5266)10/11/1999 11:39:00 PM
From: Roadkill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 11568
 
>>I believe Global Crossing said they would be interested in buying it.<<

Although we have all seen the predictions that FON will have to sell
its internet backbone to obtain FCC/DOJ approval for the merger, I
haven't seen any discussion regarding the potential for WCOM to use
this backbone as a redundant network to prevent another outage as we
saw about a month ago. In theory, FON could sell its backbone but keep
a single fiber or two (like Williams did several years ago) for use
strictly as a redundant network should WCOM suffer an outage in its
primary backbone. This could be a condition of the sale of the FON
backbone. Sure, FON would get less money for the system, but the
combined WCOM/FON internet backbone would offer something no other
carrier has: guaranteed redundancy. Kennard can't complain about that,
because the bulk of FON's backbone would have been sold, yet e-commerce
is secured due to this redundancy. It would give WCOM a huge selling
point with potential customers, and an advantage that no other carrier
would be likely to match in the near future, if ever.
Any thoughts on the viability of this?