SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (77053)10/26/1999 3:29:00 AM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577030
 
Hi Tenchusatsu; Re that i840 system that is fast as hell.

You could make an SDRAM system that is fast as hell too. Just build in two memory channels, and require paired memory, just like on the i840.

There are extra expenses associated with adding in the second channel, and that is why people aren't doing it much. For one thing, you end up taking more room for memory on the motherboard.

By the way, there was a fascinating quote on Rambus power consumption issues impacting on performance issues. I am going to post it over on the Rambus thread, as soon as I have caught up with my reading there.

-- Carl



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (77053)10/26/1999 9:51:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577030
 
<Micron seems to think that the 840 is "fast as hell.">
Eahh, the "fast as hell" makes 2.5% performance gain
over 100MHz BX:
Message 11698346

No need to throw additional "evidences" about the
evident.
Micron feels this way because i820 does not work,
and VIA-133 is dog-slow, slower than PC100 440BX.
They have little choice if any.

The only thing Intel needed for a good winning
platform was to add few gates to make 2:1 lock
for AGP bus on i440BX. They must be either very
smartass politicians or total idiots not to see
this performance solution. They apparently decided
to bend over the PC industry one more time with
the RAMBUST. It is paying back now.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (77053)10/26/1999 12:48:00 PM
From: Steve Porter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577030
 
Tench,

I say again, I have no doubt the 840 is fast as hell.. I do have a problem with it being positioned (at least temporarily) as the 'preferred' chipset for coppermines on the desktop..

Note the line:

The performance advantage you get for the price you pay is worth it

If it's fast as hell, and the performance for the price is only 'worth it' it must be pretty fscking expensive too..

Steve