SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Petz who wrote (81354)11/29/1999 2:29:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Respond to of 1572790
 
Petz - <Using 104 sq. mm, we get 302 die per wafer.>

OOOPS. Yep. You got it right. Sorry if you read my first response. I get ~245 die per wafer.

PB




To: Petz who wrote (81354)11/29/1999 2:33:00 AM
From: Process Boy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1572790
 
Petz - <That leaves 240 Athlons per wafer if the yield was 100%.>

This is every process guy's dream :-).

<I would be ecstatic if AMD had 50% yield already on the 0.18 process.>

Wow. At Intel, somebody probably wouldn't be getting any bonus for that kind of performance, if not "reallocated".

PB



To: Petz who wrote (81354)11/29/1999 3:05:00 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572790
 
RE <<<Remember also that, for most of Q4's output, the die size was 16X mm, with maybe only 40-50 good Athlons out of 150 per wafer.>>>

Petz, thanks...no one did answer the question. To take what you said further, next year at best the yield off a Dresden wafer at best probably will be 120 chips. So we can expect production for at least the first half to be at a rate of 120 X 5000 wafers X 4 wks X 6 mos to be about 14 mil chips.

Does that figure seem pretty reasonable? That's assuming if Dresden is used for nothing else but Athlons.

ted



To: Petz who wrote (81354)11/29/1999 8:56:00 AM
From: niceguy767  Respond to of 1572790
 
Thanks for closing on this issue John. Nice to establish a frame of reference for potential production of Athlons, even if premature!

Also John, thanks for post #80230. Very helpful (any my guess is fairly accurate) development of estimated 99Q4 earnings. And well before positive earnings for 99Q4 were considered a possibility by many!