SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New Qualcomm - a S&P500 company -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: w molloy who wrote (6106)2/2/2000 12:07:00 PM
From: Randall Knight  Respond to of 13582
 
Forecasts through 2004

I wonder if China changes things?



To: w molloy who wrote (6106)2/2/2000 12:20:00 PM
From: puzzlecraft  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
The slide showing the evolution paths of CDMA and GSM to 3G leave outs HDR!

strategisgroup.com (go to page 14)

The CDMA path shows "CDMA" going to "IS-95B 64kbps" then to "IXRTT 144kpbs" and then to "3G 2mbps".

The GSM path shows "GSM/TDMA" going to "GPRS 115 kpbs" and then to "EDGE 384 kbps" and also an alternate route to EDGE skipping GPRS, then from EDGE to "3G 2mbps".

But what about 3X and HDR???? HDR is 2mbps... is HDR = 3G??? If not, then when the CDMA path goes to HDR which is 2mbps, why go from there to "3G" at all? Was the chart designer in denial in leaving out HDR? Also, can GSM go to 3G without HDR? Also, does CDMA going to HDR require 3X?

John



To: w molloy who wrote (6106)2/2/2000 7:34:00 PM
From: pheilman_  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 13582
 
Suspect growth numbers.
Note the careful choice of the numbers in this excerpt.
The cited report gives numbers from 1996 through 2004. So, there
are some actual numbers and some projections. Now let's look at the
projected growths.
................ ..... . . ...........Actual. . . . . . . . . . Projected.
GSM year over year.. ..75%. 65% . 35%-->20% 7%
CDMA year over year 150% 74% 104%-->29% 38%

CDMA growth suddenly falls below GSM. The actual numbers show a clear
saturation in GSM sales and an acceleration in CDMA sales so why project
the opposite? Plot the sales on a logarithmic scale, makes the poor curve fit obvious.

Eric's careful editing of the table made this bizarre projection a
lot harder to spot. Must have just gotten tired of typing in the figures.
Oh, yeah that was from the NOK thread, hmmmm.

For Q holders, this is great news, expensive reports are still being
sold that are generated by GSM shills. And analysts are thinking they
are doing due diligence when they read them and make projections.