Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: semiconeng who wrote (99037)	2/14/2000 7:52:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

So is that 1 million total since starting to produce coppermines, YTD or just WW07?

To: semiconeng who wrote (99037)	2/14/2000 8:01:00 PM
From: Process Boy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

semiconeng - <CONGRATULATIONS! FAB12 <Geko> Ocotillo More Than 1 MILLION Coppermine Shipped WW07 Thank You For Your OUTSTANDING EFFORTS> I bet they did it (die to assembly from wafer sort in one week). I'll probably know for sure tomorrow. Thank you for going to all that effort. To be quite honest, I don't think the premise that the number is YTD has much of a chance of being correct, at least the way I understand the situation to be. PB

To: semiconeng who wrote (99037)	2/14/2000 8:07:00 PM
From: Elmer	Respond to of 186894

Re: "Intel's Poster.... Word For Word." I'm coming over to your side semiconeng. I went by there and I saw it too. It DOES seem to indicate this is 1 weeks output. I am delighted to be WRONG. EP

To: semiconeng who wrote (99037)	2/14/2000 8:16:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Thanks for the post, SemiConEng. Obviously there are still many ways to interpret the wording, but it just seems to me that the interpretation of "one millionth Coppermine" shipped since its release is way too pessimistic. YTD also wouldn't make much sense, either. And although one million in a week seems to be rather high considering the current supply crunch we're seeing right now, it could be the result of a rather steep production ramp-up. Who knows, maybe Fab 12 had problems shipping more than half a million per week before WW07? I don't know. Tenchusatsu

To: semiconeng who wrote (99037)	2/14/2000 8:28:00 PM
From: Jeff Fox	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

semicon, re:"I can't figure out how to do that in this message. If someone can let me now." Use PRE up front and /PRE trailing, enclosed in <>. Credits for this wisdom to poster Mary Cluney... techstocks.com Jeff

To: semiconeng who wrote (99037)	2/14/2000 8:40:00 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

semiconeng, Thanks for the information, and the extra effort to go back and check the exact wording. I appreciate your contribution to the thread. Lets hope for additional good new tomorrow, from the stock action today, I am guessing we will have some pleasant surprises. John PS Like to have a copy of that poster over my desk, for when things look bleak and I think of selling some of my Intel shares. Just a reminder that Intel WILL perform when the chips are down.