SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (98701)3/16/2000 9:37:00 AM
From: milo_morai  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570563
 
Scumbria Gamers don't write for 3DNow they write for DirectX or OpenGL.. If the video card maker has 3DNow! support amd.com in it's OpenGL drivers and Direct X 6.0 www1.amd.com or higher already supports 3DNow! I don't see how your comments are relative..

Remember what AMD did for Quake 2 and 3dfx amd.com .. A small mod in one File and wham big boost in Framerates.

Convince me I'm wrong, but I think the support for 3DNow! will always be there.

Milo

Comparison
amd.com



To: Scumbria who wrote (98701)3/16/2000 11:39:00 AM
From: Petz  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1570563
 
Scumbria, re:<I don't see how game developers can continue to write 3DNow! programs when the X-box uses Intel processors>

I've been following this 3DNow vs. SSE thread for a while but haven't formed a final opinion yet, but here's a couple of points:

1. Who's to say there isn't an x-box "clone" in the works, based on Gigapixel/AMD technology from one of the other console makers
2. I believe AMD has accumulated sufficient anti-trust evidence against Intel that AMD could just go ahead and implement SSE. If Intel sues, AMD's countersuit would be devastating. Therefore Intel will not sue.
3. I believe the technical issues of cloning SSE are surmountable
4. One person mentioned AltiVec -- great idea, add that also, maybe it would be enough to convince Apple to abandon PowerPC?

Petz