To: elepet who wrote (23137 ) 4/22/2000 10:01:00 PM From: StockHawk Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
>>Does one hold through hell and highwater even if it takes 3 years to come back? What's the point? << Hi elepet, I see you have already received quite a few responses to your post, I hope you will not mind one more. An observer of this thread can probably learn a lot about investing and quite a bit about psychology. Although this is one of the calmest and most focused of forums we still see lots of enthusiasm when stocks are racing up and a lot more despair when stocks are falling. In good times plenty of shiny pebbles are discussed and praised, while during downturns the validity of any stock that is down, regardless of its pedigree, is questioned. In analyzing any endeavor that has taken a turn for the worse it may be prudent to ask a key question posed in the RFM: "Was the decision-making process that I followed good or bad?" The author notes that we should prefer the good process even when the results turn out bad, because the goal isn't to never be wrong, being wrong is inevitable at least some of the time. The goal is to win more often than you lose, and that is what the gorilla game is all about. People who did their homework and bought GMST likely did so because they saw their potential monopoly power and their massive earnings potential. Despite the drop in the stock price, these prospects have probably changed very little since those purchase decisions were made. Now when the stock was over $100 someone could have placed a stop-loss order at$85 and that person might look pretty smart right this minute. Fine, something to think about for next time. But what about people like you - and me - that have held on so far. Does it make sense now to sell after the stock has fallen 60%? I would not think so. Warren Buffet has often posed a question like this: If you will be investing over the next ten years would you like to see your stock holdings go up or down? His answer has been that he would like to see the value of his holdings fall, because that means he can make new investments at lower prices. Of course, he has the confidence that he is making the right investments and believes they will ultimately rise in value. It is not easy to look at an investment day after day that has lost money. The impulse to do something - anything - can be overwhelming, and sometimes it is a pleasure just to get rid of the damn thing so you do not have to look at it any more. If the stock you bought was a mirage, that is probably the thing to do. Get rid of the garbage, get on the right track. But if it is a good stock, with good prospects, it is probably the wrong thing to do. That's how people get hurt, because our emotions scream at us to buy high and sell low. I don't know where the market is going in the short term, and I don't know where GMST is going in the short term, but I believe that the long term market trend is up, that technology companies with strong growth prospects and earnings potential will thrive, and that long term holders of their stocks will ultimately be rewarded. The price of that reward is, unfortunately, some suffering along the way. I hope this long post has made at least a little sense, and I hope you come to the right decision for yourself and your unique circumstances. Good luck! StockHawk