SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (79301)5/1/2000 4:07:00 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
Obviously. As such, you too must have cringed when you heard the "boy belongs with his father" drivel offered as an excuse for the raid.



To: epicure who wrote (79301)5/1/2000 4:25:00 PM
From: Rambi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I'm glad to hear you say this. The custody issue seems to be getting lost in the uproar over Reno/Clinton's choice of recovery tactics (!).
If, however, they are found to have acted without legal basis, does that have any imnplications for the custody case?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News