SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Who Really Pays Taxes? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kvkkc1 who wrote (242)8/15/2000 3:26:40 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 666
 
there is no longer a need for 2/3 support to override the veto. 50% + 1 = tax cuts and spending cuts. No more socialism.knc

No more socialism would be fine if somebody really wants to achieve that.

I am not interested in "tax cuts" unless FICA is addressed since my employees pay more to fica - SS, medicare than federal income tax.

Tell me which party is going to kill fica and I will vote for them. However, if its slash and burn every valuable resource this country has to offer - ie kill all national park funding, education grants etc. in an effort to cut taxes while maintaining fica which is the grossest of all then I'm not interested - I actually get some value out of national parks, etc.



To: kvkkc1 who wrote (242)8/16/2000 1:55:11 AM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 666
 
kvkkc1, I think it is you who has been smoking pot if you really believe that the republicrats would actually shrink their powerbase voluntarily. Were they truly so inclined they could pass the legislation and let Clinton veto it. They talk the talk, but they're just blowing wind off the wall.

Regards,

Barb