SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: George Burdell who wrote (35217)9/18/2000 9:03:01 AM
From: Rande Is  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57584
 
George, if you think that the list of Blue Chips I presented will continue to perform over the long term, then you believe they will nearly all double from where they are. . .just to get back to where they were selling a year ago. T, WCOM, LU. . .I hope you are right. But I can't afford to have money tied up for years in hopes that you are right.

And you completely missed the point of the Blue Chip article. If the Blue Chips are as volatile as every other stock, then they are no longer "Blue Chips" are they? And if that is true and no stock is immuned to being whacked hard on bad news, then the "CONCEPT" of Blue Chips is dead. You really should go back and READ the article. . . .not just apply Evelyn Wood to it. . . it wastes too much time.

Rande Is



To: George Burdell who wrote (35217)9/18/2000 9:04:14 AM
From: Knight  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57584
 
Hi George--I agree with you in part. On the net I don't look for long haul stocks, but that's my trading style here. However, the bulk of my investments are in the safer long range hold because my funds have to last me for the rest of my life and I can't afford at 53, single white female to risk something I'm not willing to loose and isn't that what is called sound investment strategy?
Regards, Vickie