SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: bambs who wrote (40760)10/13/2000 1:44:10 PM
From: Jim Lamb  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77399
 
CSCO NORTEL LUCENT by The Motley Fool here
fool.com



To: bambs who wrote (40760)10/13/2000 1:59:11 PM
From: chic_hearne  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 77399
 
Re: I think until big cap tech bottoms...... There is great risk in this market right now in my opinion

Hi Bambs,

Where do you see "big cap tech" bottoming?

IMO, there won't be one single tech company worth over $100 Billion when she bottoms. Maybe not even over $50 billion. There's just not one out there that deserves a valuation that high, can you name one?

I pulled out of the market this morning. IMO, this is a dead cat bounce that will last anywhere from today to a month. Then we're gonna bust through the 3000 level with force. It will probably take at least 1-2 years for this sucker to unwind, so there will be many good shorting opps. For now, I just need a break for a while, at least a few weeks I'm done with this rummy game, not even gonna look at it.

There's some interesting discussion on the Clown thread comparing the Naz to the Nikkei and it's downfall. Here's some comparisons with the current Naz and Nikkei, based off of Naz 3100:

the 83 stocks in the NDX that have a p/e ratio (the other 17 don't have the necessary 'e'), are selling at an average 98 times earnings, in spite of the contraction of e.g. MSFT's p/e to a level not seen in years.
this is still HIGHER than the average p/e ratio of the Nikkei at the very top.

clearly, what these stocks would be unable to deal with is an economic downturn of some consequence, as they have very little in terms of NAV. their value is derived largely from unquantifiable intellectual property and their customers willingness and ability to pay up for it.

an economic downturn would impair the ability part. another aspect often overlooked, is that at the height of the frenzied blow-off earlier this year, most were not just priced for stellar growth, but for accelerating growth, far into the future. this is typical of the new era thinking that develops near market tops: the belief that the business cycle is dead, and that growth rates can be projected forward into infinity.

that's usually also the time when the business cycle decides to wake up from its slumber and say hello to all and sundry.


In other words, this bubble popping has a lot longer to go.

regards,

chic



To: bambs who wrote (40760)10/13/2000 2:09:01 PM
From: Ed Forrest  Respond to of 77399
 
sorry if I miss understood you. I agree with you outlook on csco.

Thought you might find this site useful.

m-w.com



To: bambs who wrote (40760)10/14/2000 11:20:37 PM
From: Techplayer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77399
 
bambs, I like INTC at this level. The chip sector is far from dead. MSFT has too much riding on investment income. Dell is a crapshoot. Companies like GLW will lead the way on the next run, imo. CSCO will track the market as it has all year.