Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : A.I.M Users Group Bulletin Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OldAIMGuy who wrote (13189)	10/15/2000 2:25:04 PM
From: Condo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18928

Tom, by now it doesn't surprise me that AIM consistently matches TA results - without, of course, the "thrill" of being whipsawed and completely missing "power surges" like yesterday's. I think that, at first anyway, AIM appears to work almost by magic. At least it did to me, so I picked up Robert Lichello's book out of curiosity. When I saw how AIM adjusts stock positions only ~5% at a time, the strength of Mr. Lichello's logic made immediate sense to me. The rough market this past April probably "clarified my thinking" too! Maybe it's one of those things you have to be looking for already before you "see" it. I don't know. But there's no arguing with the results and the AIM-versus-TA experiment you described confirms several "What-if?" scenarios I've run on my own. AIM is that "something-better" I'd been searching for. Maybe it's a question of individual need and circumstance? It sure doesn't surprise me to hear that AIM readership jumps during markets like this. - ej