Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Juli who wrote (35166)	11/14/2000 9:43:32 AM
From: edward miller	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50167

This would be a very bad precedent, and I totally disagree. I am not a partisan Republican and I don't like GW Bush. I voted for Ralph Nader. For you to think that any recount will be even close to accurate is very naive. Recounts are always fraught with danger of mischief. After living long enough to be near retirement, and in several states, I have seen enough of people to know better. Politics is the dirtiest of businesses, and the recounting is where the dirt is the worst.

To: Juli who wrote (35166)	11/14/2000 9:47:57 AM
From: OX	Respond to of 50167

OT: "if he continues to fight a recount, that he does not believe he will win in a recount." when you say "recount", please make sure to specify that you mean "HAND recount". machines have already recounted; why does anyone think a HAND recount will be any more accurate?