Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (74512)	11/14/2000 3:11:35 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

<<If all counties got started tomorrow, they would all be done within 7-10 days>> It should take no longer to count all counties than one. Each counties supplies their own counters....Don't seem like a problem to me Baker's just fullofit.

To: Dave Gore who wrote (74512)	11/14/2000 3:18:52 PM
From: alan w	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

My point is handcount all or handcount none. Handcounting some is completely partisan depending the counties selected. My goodness man, you don't want the Democrats to be accused of not wanting the will of all the people do you? alan w

To: Dave Gore who wrote (74512)	11/14/2000 3:24:06 PM
From: Qone0	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Yo dave, tell me what if the democrates chose to ignore the 5 pm deadline for certifying the vote count in their counties. The sec.of state could throw out their entire counts. Before the absetee ballots are counted. The Democrates have a chose to make before 5pm. They can play the game by the rules or risk knowing that they have lost the absentee vote and continue to try and change the rules. Which one will they chose?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (74512)	11/14/2000 3:24:35 PM
From: SecularBull	Respond to of 769667

You're grasping for straws. The Gore camp only asked for 4 counties, and the judge gave them until 5 pm to report. LoF

To: Dave Gore who wrote (74512)	11/14/2000 3:29:07 PM
From: Greta Mc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Hey, wait a second. I thought Al wanted to make sure ALL votes were properly counted (I just loved that naive little boy face he put on yesterday when he suddenly seemed to realize that the tabulation of ten's of millions of votes cast may not be calculated with 100% accuracy). That would mean doing recounts of every ballot submitted throughout the entire country, right? Oh boy, if we follow Al's fantasy idea of how votes should be tabulated (you know, we hand count every ballot and interpret "intentions" of some voters), then we should know who won this election by, maybe, 2004??