Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (120532)	12/4/2000 6:02:55 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

John, I don't understand why you are ignoring Gore's strongest card, which is the tampered absentee ballot applications. We are still in the early innings of this game. Scumbria

To: Road Walker who wrote (120532)	12/4/2000 6:04:13 PM
From: Petz	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

John, <The exception, IMHO, is the Secretary of State. Which is too bad> If you read the letters sent to the Sec'y, you would understand why she rejected their recount proposals. Not one of them mentioned the RESULTS of the sample county recount process. One or two of them mentioned they did a 3-sample precinct count but then just said that, based on the results, they wanted to count the whole county. Thats akin to saying, since the wind was blowing from the east, we want to recount the county. No statistical evidence or proof whatsoever. If someone is trying to weigh the relative weight to be given to two Florida laws, they need to be given the probability that a recount will affect the outcome. Petz