Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (104744)	12/7/2000 6:37:33 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Nah. The post election "hand recounts" will still be subjective and standardless and therefore, of little consequence. JLA

To: Ellen who wrote (104744)	12/7/2000 6:54:48 PM
From: Selectric II	Respond to of 769667

You still don't seem to get it. Am starting to wonder whether you ever will. Which of about 12 different standards would be applied to the "undercount"? If you had your wish, the standard that gives Gore the most votes, of course, whether or not applied consistently, or in Miami-Dade, or even in another state. Well, guess what? The only objective standard is the machine count, for which the ballots were designed, manufactured, and voted. And the answer is that they were counted twice, and there were -0- votes.