Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (107414)	12/9/2000 8:47:19 AM
From: J.B.C.	Respond to of 769670

The same should have happened with Gore, he lost the count, recount, rerecount and didn't concede. Where's his honor, A: he has none. Jim

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (107414)	12/9/2000 8:50:09 AM
From: levy	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

US Supreme Court will find in favor of Bush...here is why. If you change the sample you change the findings. In this case examining the UNDERVOTE instead of all the votes alters the result...... If a dimple counts as a vote then a dimple plus a clear punch should be excluded as a vote for two candidates but yet it is not being considered. The computers can sort out the undervote as it sees it as a vote for no one but can not detect ballots with a hole for one candidate and a dimple for another. This would require a manual recount of all ballots. Gore received 200000 more votamatic votes than Bush across the state of Florida so by selectively examining the extra votes from the UNDERVOTE he stands to gain. For the same reason Gore however would also stand to lose more votes than Bush from the extra OVERVOTES which are not being examined. Since the effect on counting dimples on the OVERVOTE is not be examined the US Supreme Court will rule that the UNDERVOTE selective count is illegal.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (107414)	12/9/2000 9:27:38 AM
From: The Street	Respond to of 769670

Depends upon what method of counting is used. If they are divining, then he should not. If they are using a technical standard, I would agree once we count the military votes-- do you agree? But, then again, this recount is invalid due to (mainly): ** It is not a statewide FULL count That is in the Code...

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (107414)	12/9/2000 9:38:11 AM
From: RON BL	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Yes count and recount and recount. Handle the ballots over and over dimpling them here and dimpling them there, manufacturing votes all the while. Then the very first time your guy finally gets the right count immediately demand that Bush should concede . Spoken like the blatant vile fanatic you and the rest of your cronies are. A pack of liars and cheats with no moral principles. You deserve to have been born in the Soviet Union where you would have made a great Party Member.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (107414)	12/9/2000 10:22:20 AM
From: Thehammer	Respond to of 769670

<<If Bush loses recount, he should concede. >> Coming from you this is really lame.

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (107414)	12/9/2000 10:53:23 AM
From: Neil H	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

"If Bush loses recount, he should concede." Just like your man Gore has eh counselor. With your logic I'm surprised you are not on the FLA. supreme court. You would fit in well. Regards Neil